Save 20% on select titles with code HIDDEN24 - Shop The Sale Now
Cementitious repair mortars are commonly used to rehabilitate deteriorated wastewater concrete infrastructure prior to the application of high-performance lining systems. These repair mortars occasionally receive a broom finish creating a “profiled” surface prior to the application of a trowel- or spray-applied protective lining system. Other recommendations require that that the cementitious mortars receive a blasted surface to impart a mechanical profile prior to topcoating with a similar lining system. In the following paper the author summarize the results of an investigation to quantitatively assess adhesion of a protective lining when applied to a broom finish surface verses a blasted surface.
We are unable to complete this action. Please try again at a later time.
If this error continues to occur, please contact AMPP Customer Support for assistance.
Error Message:
Please login to use Standards Credits*
* AMPP Members receive Standards Credits in order to redeem eligible Standards and Reports in the Store
You are not a Member.
AMPP Members enjoy many benefits, including Standards Credits which can be used to redeem eligible Standards and Reports in the Store.
You can visit the Membership Page to learn about the benefits of membership.
You have previously purchased this item.
Go to Downloadable Products in your AMPP Store profile to find this item.
You do not have sufficient Standards Credits to claim this item.
Click on 'ADD TO CART' to purchase this item.
Your Standards Credit(s)
1
Remaining Credits
0
Please review your transaction.
Click on 'REDEEM' to use your Standards Credits to claim this item.
You have successfully redeemed:
Go to Downloadable Products in your AMPP Store Profile to find and download this item.
The purpose of surface preparation is to get a required adhesion between steel and the coated film. Adhesion is a significant factor for the suitability and life of protective coatings in corrosive surroundings. In the shipbuilding industry, air blasting with round blasting nozzles is common practice for achieving the productivity and proper surface profile. Generally, the round blasting nozzle cannot evenly spread the abrasive material on a steel surface compared with a rectangular nozzle.
This paper will discuss utilizing temporary dehumidification and climate control equipment to reduce corrosion levels during the installation of coatings and linings applications; the science of Psychrometrics, the science behind dehumidification, and discuss how the components interact on a coatings project.
The aim of this case study is to identify the challenges of blasting a large bridge, blasting at long distances from equipment, and painting on a maintenance program vs the whole bridge. Then we provide recommendations and suggestions how to make it profitable, based on real-life project experience.
The effects of three blasting methods utilised for surface preparation upon the behavior of five organic coating systems are investigated. The blasting methods include dry blast cleaning, UHP and UHPAB. It is shown that pull-off strength, pull-off failure mode, and delamination are significantly affected by the surface preparation method.
Industries such as oil and gas, marine, cleaning and protective coatings face many changes and challenges from environmental, safety and other regulatory agencies. Most of these changes have to do with containment regulations and minimizing dust in open air blast environments. With these regulations now in place, contractors are looking for alternatives to traditional dry blasting.
General Dynamics NASSCO proved that by modernizing its facilities and changing its operations it could build ships similarly to the industry leaders in Asia.
The Southern Delivery System is a 62-mile steel pipeline built to transport water from Pueblo Reservoir to Colorado Springs. A contract was awarded to the coatings applicator to install an antifouling coating system that would start from the new conduit, exiting the dam, to the first bulkhead.
To achieve adequate protection of assets, use of a protective coating is one of predominant methods used in the oil and gas industry. There are several factors contribute in the coating service life, including surface preparation, coating application, coating material and environmental conditions. It is well known in the coating industry that 70% of the coating failures are attributed to improper surface preparation.
Abrasive material forms a major component for surface preparation in coating applications. Since blasting method developed in 1890s, abrasive materials and its application methods also significantly improved to enhance blasting efficiency. In general, steel grit and shot ball are being used predominantly as metallic abrasives. Garnet and coal slag are used as non-metallic abrasives. Each abrasive is selected andapplied in accordance with the work location and substrate material of structures to be coated. In this study, we have evaluated a new artificial non-metallic abrasive (ferrochrome slag) which is a by-product from ferrochrome production process for stainless steel. This evaluation also included the checking of surface cleanliness performance and coating quality based on international test methods and field trials. For verifying the cleanliness quality, various tests were conducted as per international standards (ISO 8501-8503). Sea water immersion test (ISO 2812-2) and cyclic test (ISO 12944-9) were carried out to checkcoating performance after blasting. The field test results indicates that all inspection and quality criteria of surface preparation were met as per international standards. Furthermore, coating performance test results also showed this abrasive does not have any adverse effect on coating properties.
This project is to evolve, with the developer of a portable, sponge media blasting system, an alternative to power tool corrosion removal. This is a NAVSEA project managed by the National Surface Treatment Center (NST Center).
Vapor/wet blasting is proving to be an attractive method for surface preparation of steel, concrete, wood and other substrates. By using just enough media and water to suppress dust and achieve the desired production rates, Vapor Abrasive® blasting avoids the dusty side effects of dry blasting and the messy runoff generated by wet blasting. To achieve optimal results in Vapor Abrasive® blasting, the system must be properly matched for the job at hand.