Celebrate World Corrosion Awareness Day with 20% off eCourses and eBooks with code WCAD2024 at checkout!
The monitoring program used in the Danish Sector of the North Sea to manage microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) risk assessment for seven pipelines. Quantitative data on microbial activity was obtained from pigging debris using real-time polymerase chain reaction of MIC-causing microorganisms.
Offshore oil production typically include a pipeline network for transferring pressurized injection water and multiphase liquids. It is essential for production that integrity is maintained to ensure a long safe lifetime of the pipelines and keeping downtime to a minimum. Microbiological influenced corrosion (MIC) causes development of pitting and internal channeling corrosion features which pose a challenge to the pipeline integrity. MIC risk assessment requires a monitoring program to determine numbers and activity of sulfate-reducing prokaryotes and methanogens. To provide the most representative samples pigging debris were collected regularly from pipelines in the Danish Sector of the North Sea. Quantitative data on microbial activity using qPCR/RT-qPCR of MIC-causing microorganisms in seven pipelines and model prediction of MIC risk showed that the highest risk was present in multiphase pipelines operated at inlet temperatures in the range 53–66 °C. The predicted maximum pitting corrosion rate was <0.51 mm/year and the estimated pigging frequency was 37 days to counteract MIC. In other pipelines transferring injection water or crude oil the MIC risk was at least ten times lower. As part of the MIC risk management inline inspections of several high risk MIC pipelines are planned with the aim to improve MIC mitigation.Key words: Pipelines Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion (MIC) Mitigation Danish Sector of the North Sea sulfate-reducing Bacteria (SRB) methanogens batch biocide injection continuous biocide injection qPCR Reverse Transcriptase qPCR (RT-qPCR) cell specific activity (CSA) index MIC risk management.
Keywords: downloadable, Pipelines, microbiologically Influenced Corrosion (MIC), mitigation, North Sea, sulfate-reducing bacteria, methanogens, biocide injection, qPCR, cell specific activity, risk management
Inspection of offshore pipelines is essential to provide vital information required for integrity assessment to allow data driven engineering decisions to be made and prevent costly failures. This paper presents experience from applying Internal Corrosion Direct Assessment (ICDA) for offshore pipelines in the North Sea.
We are unable to complete this action. Please try again at a later time.
If this error continues to occur, please contact AMPP Customer Support for assistance.
Use this error code for reference:
Please login to use Standards Credits*
* AMPP Members receive Standards Credits in order to redeem eligible Standards and Reports in the Store
You are not a Member.
AMPP Members enjoy many benefits, including Standards Credits which can be used to redeem eligible Standards and Reports in the Store.
You can visit the Membership Page to learn about the benefits of membership.
You have previously purchased this item.
Go to Downloadable Products in your AMPP Store profile to find this item.
You do not have sufficient Standards Credits to claim this item.
Click on 'ADD TO CART' to purchase this item.
Your Standards Credit(s)
1
Remaining Credits
0
Please review your transaction.
Click on 'REDEEM' to use your Standards Credits to claim this item.
You have successfully redeemed:
Go to Downloadable Products in your AMPP Store Profile to find and download this item.
This paper summarizes major elements of a recent recommended practice (RP) on Pipeline Corrosion Management (PCM) published by the European Federation of Corrosion (EFC). The RP goes into details on a methodical approach to carrying out PCM.
We describe the advancement of an activity-based quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay which can distinguish live from dead corrosion influencing microorganisms in oil and gas pipeline environments. We discuss the limitations and possible future optimization methods for Propidium monazide-qPCR techniques in the industry.