Server maintenance is scheduled for Saturday, December 21st between 6am-10am CST.

During that time, parts of our website will be affected until maintenance is completed. Thank you for your patience.

Menu
Search
Filters
Close
Menu

Use GIVING24 at checkout to save 20% on eCourses and books (some exclusions apply)!

Bridge Coating Maintenance Strategies

Bridge Coating Maintenance Strategies
Available for download

When it comes to a bridge structure with a serviceable Organic Zinc / Epoxy / Urethane (OZ/E/U) coating system, there is no golden answer on the most cost-effective maintenance painting strategy. Depending on the severity and amount of corrosion and coating breakdown on the structure, planned maintenance surface preparations range from spot power tool cleaning and spot painting to a full SSPC-SP 10 media blast and full recoating operation. 

Product Number: 51322-18061-SG
Author: Eric Shoyer, Nick Fabritiis, Pete Ault, Peter McDonagh
Publication Date: 2022
Industries: Corrosion Monitoring and Control , Coatings
$0.00
$20.00
$20.00

Choosing the proper maintenance strategy when scoping a coatings project is difficult, and potentially costly if incorrect procedures are utilized. This is especially true for steel bridges with millions of square feet of coated surface to be repaired and coated. For the last 30 years, bridge coating maintenance has been dominated by the desire to remove lead coatings from existing structures, followed by the application of Zinc/Epoxy/Urethane or other modern coatings systems. These modern coating systems are now reaching the age where major maintenance is required, and the decision must be made regarding how much coating to retain, and what methods will be used to clean and paint. This paper presents results of field and laboratory testing of alternative approaches to maintaining an Organic Zinc/Epoxy/Urethane bridge coatings system. 

Choosing the proper maintenance strategy when scoping a coatings project is difficult, and potentially costly if incorrect procedures are utilized. This is especially true for steel bridges with millions of square feet of coated surface to be repaired and coated. For the last 30 years, bridge coating maintenance has been dominated by the desire to remove lead coatings from existing structures, followed by the application of Zinc/Epoxy/Urethane or other modern coatings systems. These modern coating systems are now reaching the age where major maintenance is required, and the decision must be made regarding how much coating to retain, and what methods will be used to clean and paint. This paper presents results of field and laboratory testing of alternative approaches to maintaining an Organic Zinc/Epoxy/Urethane bridge coatings system. 

Product tags
Also Purchased
Picture for Bayesian Modeling Coating Performance
Available for download

Bayesian Modeling Coating Performance

Product Number: 51322-17612-SG
Author: James A. Ellor, Daniel Pope, Anthony Florimbio, C.Thomas Savell, Lisa A. Barker, John Repp
Publication Date: 2022
$20.00

Coating degradation on Army ground systems represents a significant maintenance cost and effort. The objective of this proposed work is to develop a predictive model for coating degradation and subsequent substrate corrosion on Army ground assets. Provided with a better understanding of the root causes, steps can be taken to reduce corrosion impacts on Army materiel.
Picture for Conditioning Of Steel Surfaces With Various Abrasive Blast Media And Effect On Coating Performance
Available for download

Conditioning Of Steel Surfaces With Various Abrasive Blast Media And Effect On Coating Performance

Product Number: 51322-17888-SG
Author: Andrew Recker, Darryl Corbin, Yuxin Zhai
Publication Date: 2022
$20.00

Over the past few decades surface preparation standards have been implemented to provide guidance on determining the necessary surface cleanliness for specific applications. Prior to such standards, surfaces were prepared as they saw fit at the time of application which created high variability in performance of the protective coating. Since the standards were developed, the resulting performance consistency has become increased significantly. Such standards discuss a visual inspection of the steel after an abrasive material has been used to remove scale, rust, and other discoloration soils.
Biocide Storage Tank Internal Corrosion and A Mitigation Strategy – A Case Study
Available for download

Biocide Storage Tank Internal Corrosion And A Mitigation Strategy – A Case Study

Product Number: 51322-17906-SG
Author: Ayman A. Alabdullatif, Rakan A. Al-Shebil, Wakeel Ahmad
Publication Date: 2022
$20.00

Variability of operation and practices can lead to mechanical integrity issues of equipment. A similar case was observed when an external UT survey was conducted on a biocide storage tank that showed localized areas of metal loss in the tank wall. The tank was opened for inspection and extensive internal corrosion damage was observed mainly in the form of large isolated pits. Three potential corrosion mitigation options were evaluated: upgrading the tank material from coated carbon steel to 316 stainless steel, installing a non-metallic lining, or keeping using the coated carbon steel and changing the operation practices. Each mitigation option was evaluated based integrity, feasibility, and economic factors. It was found that keeping the coated carbon steel and adjusting the operation practices can ensure the integrity of the tank while lowering the required economical investment. As such, a new operation manual was issued for the biocide storage tanks that ensured that the corrosion inducing environments are avoided.
Categories
Industry
Recently viewed
Popular tags
View all

Association for Materials Protection and Performance

© AMPP All Rights Reserved.
Membership Terms of Content Use
Contact Customer Support