Server maintenance is scheduled for Saturday, December 21st between 6am-10am CST.

During that time, parts of our website will be affected until maintenance is completed. Thank you for your patience.

Menu
Search
Filters
Close
Menu

Use GIVING24 at checkout to save 20% on eCourses and books (some exclusions apply)!

51318-11244- MIC Considerations for Cathodically Protected Encased Ductile Iron Pipelines: A Case Study

Picture for 51318-11244- MIC Considerations for Cathodically Protected Encased Ductile Iron Pipelines: A Case Study
Available for download

A case study where MIC was recognized as primary cause of failure for an encased ductile iron water pipeline. The cathodically protected pipe was located within the proximity a creek crossing and had suffered from multiple failures.

 

.

 

Product Number: 51318-11244-SG
Author: Jeffry B. Giddings / Mersedeh Akhoondan / Graham Bell
Publication Date: 2018
Industries: Cathodic Protection , Pipelines, Tanks, and Underground Systems
$0.00
$20.00
$20.00

There is a wide range of opinions about the proper method of corrosion control, including the need for cathodic protection, tight bonded coating and polyethylene encasement for ductile iron pipe. While polyethylene encasements are commonly used for protection of ductile iron pipe, there is a concern about microbiological influenced (MIC) corrosion mechanism beneath loosely-bonded polyethylene in certain environment. This paper presents a case study where MIC was recognized as primary cause of failure for an encased ductile iron water pipeline. The cathodically protected pipe was located within the proximity a creek crossing and had suffered from multiple failures. An investigation initiated to determine the root cause of failures and make recommendations to mitigate future problems. The field inspection included cathodic protection surveys, soil corrosivity survey and evaluation of suspect joints, polyethylene encasement and joint bonds. Samples were collected and sent to a laboratory in for further testing. A gray fused “cemented” sand was observed near the failure zones. Traces of black granular solids adhered to the pipe near joints. Gray paste and black tuberculation were found on the surfaces of the pipe beneath the polyethylene. The field and laboratory investigations indicated significant bacteria activities and MIC. Presence of high concentration of sulfate in the soil likely contributed to the bacteria growth. The preliminary results of this investigation is presented in this paper. The authors believe that presenting this investigation in the form of a case study will instigate further interest and research in this area.

Key Words: Corrosion, microbiological influenced, bacteria, ductile iron, polyethylene encasement, cathodic polarization

There is a wide range of opinions about the proper method of corrosion control, including the need for cathodic protection, tight bonded coating and polyethylene encasement for ductile iron pipe. While polyethylene encasements are commonly used for protection of ductile iron pipe, there is a concern about microbiological influenced (MIC) corrosion mechanism beneath loosely-bonded polyethylene in certain environment. This paper presents a case study where MIC was recognized as primary cause of failure for an encased ductile iron water pipeline. The cathodically protected pipe was located within the proximity a creek crossing and had suffered from multiple failures. An investigation initiated to determine the root cause of failures and make recommendations to mitigate future problems. The field inspection included cathodic protection surveys, soil corrosivity survey and evaluation of suspect joints, polyethylene encasement and joint bonds. Samples were collected and sent to a laboratory in for further testing. A gray fused “cemented” sand was observed near the failure zones. Traces of black granular solids adhered to the pipe near joints. Gray paste and black tuberculation were found on the surfaces of the pipe beneath the polyethylene. The field and laboratory investigations indicated significant bacteria activities and MIC. Presence of high concentration of sulfate in the soil likely contributed to the bacteria growth. The preliminary results of this investigation is presented in this paper. The authors believe that presenting this investigation in the form of a case study will instigate further interest and research in this area.

Key Words: Corrosion, microbiological influenced, bacteria, ductile iron, polyethylene encasement, cathodic polarization

Product tags
Also Purchased
Picture for 07127 Investigating Ductile Iron Pipelines
Available for download

07127 Investigating Ductile Iron Pipelines

Product Number: 51300-07127-SG
ISBN: 07127 2007 CP
Author: Daniel W. Crabtree, Mark R. Breslin, Chris J. Sordelet, Johnnie A. Terrazas, and John Van Deusen
Publication Date: 2007
$20.00

This paper presents several case histories where ductile iron pipeline sections have been investigated to ascertain the corrosioncontrol benefits of polyethylene encasement. Investigative procedures, included cell-to-cell potential surveys, side-drain technique measurements, in-situ and laboratory soil tests, pipe-to-soil potential measurements and excavation inspections.
Picture for Ductile Iron Corrosion Science and Theories
Available for download

51313-02485-Ductile Iron Corrosion Science and Theories

Product Number: 51313-02485-SG
ISBN: 02485 2013 CP
Author: Michael Szeliga
Publication Date: 2013
$20.00
Picture for 51318-11270- DC Transit Stray Current Corrosion Control: Everyone Wins When You Work Together
Available for download

51318-11270- DC Transit Stray Current Corrosion Control: Everyone Wins When You Work Together

Product Number: 51318-11270-SG
Author: Vera Kustova / Dale Lindemuth / Chad Kuykendall
Publication Date: 2018
$20.00

This case history covers the stray current corrosion control program for a natural gas pipeline operator with assets influenced by operation of a nearby direct powered light rail transit system.

 
Categories
Industry
Recently viewed
Popular tags
View all

Association for Materials Protection and Performance

© AMPP All Rights Reserved.
Membership Terms of Content Use
Contact Customer Support