Server maintenance is scheduled for Saturday, December 21st between 6am-10am CST.
During that time, parts of our website will be affected until maintenance is completed. Thank you for your patience.
Use GIVING24 at checkout to save 20% on eCourses and books (some exclusions apply)!
This case history covers the stray current corrosion control program for a natural gas pipeline operator with assets influenced by operation of a nearby direct powered light rail transit system.
This case history covers the stray current corrosion control program for a natural gas pipeline operator with assets influenced by operation of a nearby direct powered light rail transit system. The first phase of the 40+ mile long transit system went into service in the late 1990s. Part of the operational covenants included a proactive, mutually responsible agreement with the gas company to monitor and manage stray current effects on the gas system infrastructure. Transit track electrical isolation measures were included in the transit system design and construction to control stray current directly at the source. However, these measures are degrading with age resulting in greater stray current leakage and an increase in stray current monitoring and mitigation by the gas company along with increased maintenance and surveillance by the transit agency. This paper highlights the pipeline stray current control program including evaluation procedures and mitigation/corrective measures employed. Most notably is the ongoing cooperation between the gas company and the transit agency to solve issues and maintain effective stray current control in a manner satisfactory to both parties.
Key Words: DC transit interference, track-to-earth resistance, mitigation, IR-compensated potential, datalogging, coupon, electrical resistance corrosion rate probe, cathodic protection.
Concerns related to stray DC interference. Including safety, testing, documentation and lessons learned. Also addressed are DC powered transit systems and other unordinary sources of DC interference.
We are unable to complete this action. Please try again at a later time.
If this error continues to occur, please contact AMPP Customer Support for assistance.
Error Message:
Please login to use Standards Credits*
* AMPP Members receive Standards Credits in order to redeem eligible Standards and Reports in the Store
You are not a Member.
AMPP Members enjoy many benefits, including Standards Credits which can be used to redeem eligible Standards and Reports in the Store.
You can visit the Membership Page to learn about the benefits of membership.
You have previously purchased this item.
Go to Downloadable Products in your AMPP Store profile to find this item.
You do not have sufficient Standards Credits to claim this item.
Click on 'ADD TO CART' to purchase this item.
Your Standards Credit(s)
1
Remaining Credits
0
Please review your transaction.
Click on 'REDEEM' to use your Standards Credits to claim this item.
You have successfully redeemed:
Go to Downloadable Products in your AMPP Store Profile to find and download this item.
Case histories where throttling down the cathodic protection was evaluated to determine the impact on reducing the AC corrosion threat. Includes the use of fast-response electrical resistance corrosion rate probe monitoring technology.
CP Interference and CP Influence and how the two differ. Both will be demonstrated by case histories and some solutions will be presented.