Menu
Search
Filters
Close
Menu

To Cycle or Not to Cycle: That is the Question

To Cycle or Not to Cycle: That is the Question
Available for download

Previous papers by two of the authors have examined 1) the futility of attempting to correlate accelerated corrosion testing results to real world corrosion observations, and 2) how corrosion testing is useful as an indicator of performance without the need for real world correlation and what may be expected in a corrosive environment and how these results can be usefully applied in the real world. This third paper in the trilogy, examines a specific attribute of accelerated corrosion testing, that being the utility of wet/dry cycling testing versus continuous fog methods. 

Product Number: 51217-037-SG
Author: Carl Reed, Travis Boerma, Kat Coronado, Steve Vento
Publication Date: 2017
Industries: Cathodic Protection , Corrosion Monitoring and Control
$0.00
$20.00
$20.00

Previous papers by two of the authors have examined 1) the futility of attempting to correlate accelerated corrosion testing results to real world corrosion observations, and 2) how corrosion testing is useful as an indicator of performance without the need for real world correlation and what may be expected in a corrosive environment and how these results can be usefully applied in the real world. This third paper in the trilogy, examines a specific attribute of accelerated corrosion testing, that being the utility of wet/dry cycling testing versus continuous fog methods. For 30+ years, wet/dry cyclic accelerated corrosion testing has been lauded as a much improved method of accelerated corrosion testing versus continuous electrolyte fog methodology. Yet, there has been little objective evidence to support this contention, one way or the other. Evidence has generally been observational and anecdotal without using the scientific method for evaluation to determine if the methodology is in fact improved. In this study, panels with applied scribes are subjected to wet/dry cycling (1-hour wet and 1-hour dry) and to continuous electrolyte fog. The exposure times for the wet/dry cycle is 1500 hours while the exposure time for the continuous exposure is 1000 hours. The electrolytes used are 5% NaCl aqueous solution (as used in ASTM B117) and Timmons solution, an aqueous solution of 0.35% NaSO4 + 0.05% NaCl (as used in ASTM G85 Annex A5). The panels are coated with two different epoxy coatings, the composition between the two being the same except one contains aluminum pigment and the other does not. The panels are evaluated for corrosion at the scribe and scribe creep and cathodic delamination. Expectation from this study is to be able to determine if there is a mechanistic difference in using wet/dry cycling over continuous exposure for corrosion evaluation. This will then allow the user to choose an accelerated corrosion method that better suits the environment and timing for coatings evaluation.

Previous papers by two of the authors have examined 1) the futility of attempting to correlate accelerated corrosion testing results to real world corrosion observations, and 2) how corrosion testing is useful as an indicator of performance without the need for real world correlation and what may be expected in a corrosive environment and how these results can be usefully applied in the real world. This third paper in the trilogy, examines a specific attribute of accelerated corrosion testing, that being the utility of wet/dry cycling testing versus continuous fog methods. For 30+ years, wet/dry cyclic accelerated corrosion testing has been lauded as a much improved method of accelerated corrosion testing versus continuous electrolyte fog methodology. Yet, there has been little objective evidence to support this contention, one way or the other. Evidence has generally been observational and anecdotal without using the scientific method for evaluation to determine if the methodology is in fact improved. In this study, panels with applied scribes are subjected to wet/dry cycling (1-hour wet and 1-hour dry) and to continuous electrolyte fog. The exposure times for the wet/dry cycle is 1500 hours while the exposure time for the continuous exposure is 1000 hours. The electrolytes used are 5% NaCl aqueous solution (as used in ASTM B117) and Timmons solution, an aqueous solution of 0.35% NaSO4 + 0.05% NaCl (as used in ASTM G85 Annex A5). The panels are coated with two different epoxy coatings, the composition between the two being the same except one contains aluminum pigment and the other does not. The panels are evaluated for corrosion at the scribe and scribe creep and cathodic delamination. Expectation from this study is to be able to determine if there is a mechanistic difference in using wet/dry cycling over continuous exposure for corrosion evaluation. This will then allow the user to choose an accelerated corrosion method that better suits the environment and timing for coatings evaluation.

Product tags
Also Purchased
Picture for Study on the Mechanism and Influencing Factors of High Voltage Direct Current Interference
Available for download

Study on the Mechanism and Influencing Factors of High Voltage Direct Current Interference

Product Number: 51317--9293-SG
ISBN: 9293 2017 CP
Author: Zitao Jiang
Publication Date: 2017
$20.00

High voltage direct current (HVDC) transmission results in a large direct current will into the earth. This may cause interference on a buried pipeline even though it is far from the earth electrode. In this work, numerical simulation was used to study the mechanism and influencing factors of HVDC interference.
Picture for Researches on AC Corrosion Risk Assessment Criteria for Cathodically Protected Carbon Steel
Available for download

Researches on AC Corrosion Risk Assessment Criteria for Cathodically Protected Carbon Steel

Product Number: 51317--8962-SG
ISBN: 8962 2017 CP
Author: Yanxia Du
Publication Date: 2017
$20.00

Experiments to study the effects of AC interference on cathodic protection (CP). Changes of CP potential and current density under AC interference and AC corrosion rates obtained. Effective CP potential under AC interference analyzed. Interference compared.
Picture for Distributed Sacrificial Cathodic Protection – A New Cost Effective Solution to Prevent Corrosion on
Available for download

Distributed Sacrificial Cathodic Protection – A New Cost Effective Solution to Prevent Corrosion on Subsea Structures

Product Number: 51317--8941-SG
ISBN: 8941 2017 CP
Author: Roy Johnsen
Publication Date: 2017
$20.00

In this paper, a new concept named CP by distributed sacrificial anodes (DSA) is presented. The main principle of CP by DSA is to convert cathode area to anode area by distributing anode mass over the surface of the equipment to be protected.
Categories
Industry
Recently viewed
Popular tags
View all

Association for Materials Protection and Performance

© AMPP All Rights Reserved.
Membership Terms of Content Use
Contact Customer Support