Server maintenance is scheduled for Saturday, December 21st between 6am-10am CST.
During that time, parts of our website will be affected until maintenance is completed. Thank you for your patience.
Use GIVING24 at checkout to save 20% on eCourses and books (some exclusions apply)!
The paper discusses “past” developments, “present” status, and “future” advancements of inspection, monitoring, and modelling technologies.
The title of the paper denotes two attributes:
Attribute #1:
“Inspection” reveals “past” events, i.e., inspection technologies determine the corrosion rate “after” corrosion had caused loss of material
“Monitoring” reveals “Present” situation, i.e., monitoring techniques determine the corrosion rate at the time of monitoring
“Model” predicts the “future” situation, i.e., modeling predicts the “futuristic” corrosion rate based on system operating conditions.
Attribute #2:
The main objective of the paper is on Attribute #2.
In the past, the number of internal corrosion related incidences was more than 3 per 1,000 kilometers (km) of pipelines per year
In the present, the number of internal corrosion related incidences hovers around 0.5 per 1,000 km of pipelines per year
In the future, the industry’s goal is to bring the number of incidences to “ZERO”.
This paper explains “effective” and “economical” actions that are required to achieve the “ZERO” incidence goal and the roles of inspection, monitoring, and modeling activities in achieving the goal.
Key words: 5-M methodology, Corrosion control, corrosion management, integrity management, asset integrity management, pipeline integrity management, inspection, monitoring, model
Corrosion monitoring technology selection should be based on the challenges and information needs in each individual case. A combination of monitoring technologies will often provide the most reliable information, leading to improved decisions and better corrosion management.
We are unable to complete this action. Please try again at a later time.
If this error continues to occur, please contact AMPP Customer Support for assistance.
Error Message:
Please login to use Standards Credits*
* AMPP Members receive Standards Credits in order to redeem eligible Standards and Reports in the Store
You are not a Member.
AMPP Members enjoy many benefits, including Standards Credits which can be used to redeem eligible Standards and Reports in the Store.
You can visit the Membership Page to learn about the benefits of membership.
You have previously purchased this item.
Go to Downloadable Products in your AMPP Store profile to find this item.
You do not have sufficient Standards Credits to claim this item.
Click on 'ADD TO CART' to purchase this item.
Your Standards Credit(s)
1
Remaining Credits
0
Please review your transaction.
Click on 'REDEEM' to use your Standards Credits to claim this item.
You have successfully redeemed:
Go to Downloadable Products in your AMPP Store Profile to find and download this item.
A case study is presented for the Life Cycle Costing (LCC) analysis to quantify and compare different corrosion mitigation methods. Strategies to minimize the costs due to corrosion are included.
A developed monitoring approach confirmed that the EN-based electrochemical surveillance can detect changes in a petrochemical plant that otherwise could lead to catastrophic failure.