Server maintenance is scheduled for Saturday, December 21st between 6am-10am CST.

During that time, parts of our website will be affected until maintenance is completed. Thank you for your patience.

Menu
Search
Filters
Close
Menu

51318-11008-Impact of Wash Water Injection on Corrosion Control in a Gas Recovery Unit

Picture for Impact of Wash Water Injection on Corrosion Control in a Gas Recovery Unit
Available for download

Continuous wash water injection in gas recovery units (GRU) is a best practice for corrosion control. The case study describes failures that occurred in the wash water injection system.

Product Number: 51318-11008-SG
Author: Chloe Lins / Cesar Espinoza / Sudhakar Mahajanam / Bruce Copple / Joanna Folse / Gillian Sayegh / Melissa Meneses
Publication Date: 2018
Industry: Process Industries
$0.00
$20.00
$20.00

Continuous wash water injection in gas recovery units (GRU) has always been recognized as a best practice method for corrosion control. Among other functions, wash water injection in these systems traps cyanides and carries them away with the stream, thereby efficiently reducing the negative impact of cyanides on the system.

The main damage mechanisms likely to impact GRUs are sour water corrosion (SWC), hydrogen induced cracking (HIC), and stress oriented hydrogen induced cracking (SOHIC). All these damage mechanisms are closely related to the presence of H2S in an aqueous environment. Presence of cyanides in the system exacerbates these corrosion and cracking tendencies, since cyanides are known to inhibit the combination of atomic hydrogen to form molecular hydrogen (H2) gas. If this combination reaction does not take place, the steel wall becomes saturated with atomic hydrogen. The permeated atoms may eventually combine at microstructural defects and cause wet H2S damage, which could lead to cracking and through-wall penetration.

The case study described in this paper discusses failures that occurred in the wash water injection system. These failures caused the GRU to operate in the absence of wash water which meant that cyanides were not efficiently trapped or removed. The onset of hydrogen permeation was detected and measured using field inspections and hydrogen permeation probes. Condition monitoring was also performed downstream in the amine recovery unit (ARU) by tracking the level of heat stable salts. These measures helped reactivate the wash water injection program in a timely manner and avoid potential future failures downstream in the GRU compression systems.

Keywords: Sour water corrosion, HIC, SOHIC, wet H2S damage, cyanides, wash water, hydrogen permeation, heat stable salts, HSS

Continuous wash water injection in gas recovery units (GRU) has always been recognized as a best practice method for corrosion control. Among other functions, wash water injection in these systems traps cyanides and carries them away with the stream, thereby efficiently reducing the negative impact of cyanides on the system.

The main damage mechanisms likely to impact GRUs are sour water corrosion (SWC), hydrogen induced cracking (HIC), and stress oriented hydrogen induced cracking (SOHIC). All these damage mechanisms are closely related to the presence of H2S in an aqueous environment. Presence of cyanides in the system exacerbates these corrosion and cracking tendencies, since cyanides are known to inhibit the combination of atomic hydrogen to form molecular hydrogen (H2) gas. If this combination reaction does not take place, the steel wall becomes saturated with atomic hydrogen. The permeated atoms may eventually combine at microstructural defects and cause wet H2S damage, which could lead to cracking and through-wall penetration.

The case study described in this paper discusses failures that occurred in the wash water injection system. These failures caused the GRU to operate in the absence of wash water which meant that cyanides were not efficiently trapped or removed. The onset of hydrogen permeation was detected and measured using field inspections and hydrogen permeation probes. Condition monitoring was also performed downstream in the amine recovery unit (ARU) by tracking the level of heat stable salts. These measures helped reactivate the wash water injection program in a timely manner and avoid potential future failures downstream in the GRU compression systems.

Keywords: Sour water corrosion, HIC, SOHIC, wet H2S damage, cyanides, wash water, hydrogen permeation, heat stable salts, HSS

Product tags
Also Purchased
Picture for Coating System to Mitigate Against Hydrogen Cracking in Gas Dehydration Unit
Available for download

51318-11009-Coating System to Mitigate Against Hydrogen Cracking in Gas Dehydration Unit

Product Number: 51318-11009-SG
Author: Cesar Espinoza / Chloe Lins / Sudhakar Mahajanam / Ryan DuBois / Ajay Aripirala / Kate Williamson
Publication Date: 2018
$20.00

Volumetric Ultrasonic Testing (phased array) thickness measurements performed on the absorber column of a gas dehydration unit (GDU) found laminations and inclusions. The component could not continue in operation unless mitigating actions were taken.
Picture for 07575 Determination of Corrosion Mechanism for Water Wash Injection Point Failure in Saturate Gas Pl
Available for download

07575 Determination of Corrosion Mechanism for Water Wash Injection Point Failure in Saturate Gas Plant

Product Number: 51300-07575-SG
ISBN: 07575 2007 CP
Author: Robert J. Scanlan, Ricardo R. Valbuena, and Dave G. Hughes, and Dannie R. Clarida
Publication Date: 2007
$20.00
Picture for Amine base Vapor Phase Corrosion inhibitor Alternatives to Hydrazine for Steam generating system and Powwr Plants
Available for download

51318-11012-Amine base Vapor Phase Corrosion inhibitor Alternatives to Hydrazine for Steam generating system and

Product Number: 51318-11012-SG
Author: Behzad Bavarian / Lisa Reiner / James Holden / Boris Miksic
Publication Date: 2018
$20.00

Hydrazine is used as an oxygen scavenger to control corrosion in steam generating systems, despite being a genotoxic carcinogen. This investigation confirmed an Amine Base Vapor Phase Corrosion Inhibitor can be an effective replacement for toxic hydrazine.
Categories
Industry
Recently viewed
Popular tags
View all

Association for Materials Protection and Performance

© AMPP All Rights Reserved.
Membership Terms of Content Use
Contact Customer Support