Server maintenance is scheduled for Saturday, December 21st between 6am-10am CST.

During that time, parts of our website will be affected until maintenance is completed. Thank you for your patience.

Menu
Search
Filters
Close
Menu

51318-11290-Evaluating Polymer Based Materials Pipeline for Large Solids Particles Applications

Picture for Evaluating Polymer Based Materials Pipeline for Large Solids Particles Applications
Available for download

Assessment was performed on the use of polymer-based materials or liners for large solids particle slurry applications. The study was conducted in a pilot-scale horizontal slurry flow loop using two different solids: sand and rocks.

Product Number: 51318-11290-SG
Author: Kofi Freeman Adane / Aaron Fuhr / Ben Fotty
Publication Date: 2018
Industry: Materials Selection and Design
$0.00
$20.00
$20.00

Assessment was performed on the use of polymer-based materials or liners for large solids particle slurry applications. The study was conducted in a pilot-scale horizontal slurry flow loop using two different solids: sand and rocks. Each of the respective slurries from these particles contains some amount of the other. For sand slurries, sand-to-rock ratio was about 3.6 whereas for rock slurry has 0.1. The sand had median size, d50 of 0.240 mm (0.009 inches) and the rocks size was -52 mm (2 inches). The study was done in a 193.7 mm (7.625 inches) pipe flow loop with mixture velocity and solids concentration of 7.0 m/s (23 ft/s) and 15.2-21.9% v/v, respectively. Two polyurethane (water presoaked and unsoaked), 2 neoprene materials, 1 high density crosslinked polyethylene and carbon steel were subjected to these slurries. In general, the presence of the large solids significantly affected the wear based on mass loss percentage. Wear increases significantly from sand to rock slurries for polymeric materials whereas the converse was true for the carbon steel. In slurries where erosion rate is faster than water absorption rate, the advantage of water absorption for polyurethane should be evaluated. Although, direct comparison among polymers was not done, it was observed that each material responded differently to large solids. Neoprene performance is manufacturer specific and evaluation method or technique should be designed carefully, specifically slurry composition.

Key words: Wear; Pipeline; Slurry; Oil sands; Polymer; Flow Loop; Large Solids Particles

Assessment was performed on the use of polymer-based materials or liners for large solids particle slurry applications. The study was conducted in a pilot-scale horizontal slurry flow loop using two different solids: sand and rocks. Each of the respective slurries from these particles contains some amount of the other. For sand slurries, sand-to-rock ratio was about 3.6 whereas for rock slurry has 0.1. The sand had median size, d50 of 0.240 mm (0.009 inches) and the rocks size was -52 mm (2 inches). The study was done in a 193.7 mm (7.625 inches) pipe flow loop with mixture velocity and solids concentration of 7.0 m/s (23 ft/s) and 15.2-21.9% v/v, respectively. Two polyurethane (water presoaked and unsoaked), 2 neoprene materials, 1 high density crosslinked polyethylene and carbon steel were subjected to these slurries. In general, the presence of the large solids significantly affected the wear based on mass loss percentage. Wear increases significantly from sand to rock slurries for polymeric materials whereas the converse was true for the carbon steel. In slurries where erosion rate is faster than water absorption rate, the advantage of water absorption for polyurethane should be evaluated. Although, direct comparison among polymers was not done, it was observed that each material responded differently to large solids. Neoprene performance is manufacturer specific and evaluation method or technique should be designed carefully, specifically slurry composition.

Key words: Wear; Pipeline; Slurry; Oil sands; Polymer; Flow Loop; Large Solids Particles

Product tags
Also Purchased
Picture for NACE MR0175/ISO 15156: Update on current document and where are we going?
Available for download

51318-11294-NACE MR0175/ISO 15156: Update on current document and where are we going?

Product Number: 51318-11294-SG
Author: Robert P. Badrak
Publication Date: 2018
$20.00

This standard is now undergoing a critical review to determine how it should change to meet the future needs of the Oil & Gas Industry better. Where are we headed with NACE MR0175/ISO 15156? The results of our collective initial efforts are presented.
Picture for Characterization of Direct Metal Laser Sintered Alloy 718 in the As-Fabricated and Heat Treated Condition
Available for download

51318-11297-Characterization of Direct Metal Laser Sintered Alloy 718 in the As-Fabricated and Heat Treated Condition

Product Number: 51318-11297-SG
Author: Robert Badrak / Arturo Delacruz / William Howie / Sergey Kolesov
Publication Date: 2018
$20.00

This paper focuses on characterizing Alloy 718 produced via the Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) process in the as-fabricated and heat treated condition.
Picture for A New Bimetallic Solution To Manage Corrosion In Nitric Acid Plants
Available for download

51318-11284-A New Bimetallic Solution To Manage Corrosion In Nitric Acid Plants

Product Number: 51318-11284-SG
Author: Angela Philipp / Daniel Gullberg
Publication Date: 2018
$20.00

With the development of a bimetallic tube with an inner tube made of zirconium (R60702) and an outer tube in UNS S31002, it was possible to manage the challenge to provide zirconium-level performance at an affordable price.
Categories
Industry
Recently viewed
Popular tags
View all

Association for Materials Protection and Performance

© AMPP All Rights Reserved.
Membership Terms of Content Use
Contact Customer Support