Server maintenance is scheduled for Saturday, December 21st between 6am-10am CST.

During that time, parts of our website will be affected until maintenance is completed. Thank you for your patience.

Menu
Search
Filters
Close
Menu

51318-10982-Analyzing Pig Returns from a Subsea Pipeline for MIC: Sampling and Testing Challenges

Picture for Analyzing Pig Returns from a Subsea Pipeline for MIC: Sampling and Testing Challenges
Available for download

This manuscript provides case study data from subsea crude oil pipelines that addresses the questions of how to obtain the best quality samples from pig returns for microbiological testing, and what are the relative merits of different test methodologies.

Product Number: 51318-10982-SG
Author: John J. Kilbane II Ph.D.
Publication Date: 2018
Industries: Maritime , Pipelines, Tanks, and Underground Systems
$0.00
$20.00
$20.00

Monitoring pipelines for microbial corrosion can be challenging because obtaining samples is difficult.

This is particularly true of subsea pipelines where the only available samples are oil samples and pig returns. Oil samples do not provide reliable data regarding microbial concentrations in biofilms on internal pipe surfaces and the heterogeneous nature of pig returns further complicates the situation by making it difficult to obtain representative samples. Moreover, there is no consensus regarding the best testing method to be used. Microbial growth tests have the longest history of use in the industry, but have more recently been questioned for being too slow, and for not providing comprehensive microbiological data. Test methods other than microbial growth tests, such as ATP (adenosine triphosphate) quantification and genetic testing (quantitative polymerase chain reaction or qPCR), can be used to monitor microbial populations in oilfield samples. This manuscript provides case study data from subsea crude oil pipelines that addresses the questions of how to obtain the best quality samples from pig returns for microbiological testing, and what are the relative merits of different test methodologies.

Key words: MIC, microbiologically influenced corrosion, subsea, pipeline, internal corrosion, genetic, qPCR, ATP, microbial growth tests, biofilm

Monitoring pipelines for microbial corrosion can be challenging because obtaining samples is difficult.

This is particularly true of subsea pipelines where the only available samples are oil samples and pig returns. Oil samples do not provide reliable data regarding microbial concentrations in biofilms on internal pipe surfaces and the heterogeneous nature of pig returns further complicates the situation by making it difficult to obtain representative samples. Moreover, there is no consensus regarding the best testing method to be used. Microbial growth tests have the longest history of use in the industry, but have more recently been questioned for being too slow, and for not providing comprehensive microbiological data. Test methods other than microbial growth tests, such as ATP (adenosine triphosphate) quantification and genetic testing (quantitative polymerase chain reaction or qPCR), can be used to monitor microbial populations in oilfield samples. This manuscript provides case study data from subsea crude oil pipelines that addresses the questions of how to obtain the best quality samples from pig returns for microbiological testing, and what are the relative merits of different test methodologies.

Key words: MIC, microbiologically influenced corrosion, subsea, pipeline, internal corrosion, genetic, qPCR, ATP, microbial growth tests, biofilm

Product tags
Also Purchased
Picture for CORROSION RISK ASSESSMENT MODEL OF SUBSEA PIPELINES NETWORK
Available for download

51318-11049-CORROSION RISK ASSESSMENT MODEL OF SUBSEA PIPELINES NETWORK

Product Number: 51318-11049-SG
Author: Faisal M. Al-Abbas / Gusai H. Al-Aithan / Saad Muaili / Qasim Saleem / Balasubramani Bakthavatchalu / Ebadul Haque / Mohammed Barout
Publication Date: 2018
$20.00

A risk assessment model developed as part of a holistic study conducted to evaluate the condition of subsea pipelines. A systematic semi-quantitative risk-based model was developed to identify, analyze and evaluate risk associated with each subsea pipeline.
Picture for Corrosion Management of MIC Contributes to Pipeline Integrity
Available for download

51315-5729-Corrosion Management of MIC Contributes to Pipeline Integrity

Product Number: 51315-5729-SG
ISBN: 5729 2015 CP
Author: Richard Eckert
Publication Date: 2015
$0.00
Picture for Validation of DNV RP F112 for Managing Hydrogen Induced Stress Cracking (HISC) in Super Duplex Stain
Available for download

51318-10974-Validation of DNV RP F112 for Managing Hydrogen Induced Stress Cracking (HISC) in Super Duplex Stain

Product Number: 51318-10974-SG
Author: Roberto Morana / Kasra Sotoudeh / Lee Smith / Simon Smith
Publication Date: 2018
$20.00

A comprehensive test program is described quantifying the HISC performance of retrieved superduplex stainless steel subsea components and, comparing the actual performance against the limits derived following DNV RP F112: 2008.
Categories
Industry
Recently viewed
Popular tags
View all

Association for Materials Protection and Performance

© AMPP All Rights Reserved.
Membership Terms of Content Use
Contact Customer Support