Server maintenance is scheduled for Saturday, December 21st between 6am-10am CST.

During that time, parts of our website will be affected until maintenance is completed. Thank you for your patience.

Menu
Search
Filters
Close
Menu

02053 INFLUENCE OF THE TEST METHOD ON THE SSC THRESHOLD STRESS OF OCTG AND LINE PIPE STEEL GRADES

Picture for 02053 INFLUENCE OF THE TEST METHOD...
Available for download
Product Number: 51300-02053-SG
ISBN: 02053 2002 CP
Author: Jean Leyer, Pierre Sutter, Cédric P. Linne, and Yves M. Gunaltun
$0.00
$20.00
$20.00
The purpose of the study was to assess the relative degree of severity of the test methods that are available to determine the Sulfide Stress Cracking (SSC) resistance of oilfield tubulars. Three different steel grades were used: a Sour Service Line Pipe grade (X65), a Sour Service OCTG grade (T95) and a non sour service OCTG grade (P110). The SSC threshold stresses of these steels were obtained in the NACE TM0177 solution A through Tensile Tests, C-Ring Tests, and Four Point Bent Beam Tests. The two Sour Service grades exhibited high threshold stress values ( >= 90% YS) whatever the test method that was used. Not unsurprisingly the non-Sour Service grade P110 gave much lower values ( < 40%YS). The exact threshold stress values depended on the test method, the tensile test being the most conservative of all with a threshold stress below 10% YS. This first part of the study allowed us to rank the test methods in terms of severity. However, for a non Sour service grade the exact value of the threshold stress itself is of little interest for the user. It is not practical nor even possible to reduce the stress level in service, and therefore the only conclusion that can be drawn from the P110 test results is that the material is not fit for service in the conditions of NACE TM0177 solution A (PH2S 1bar, pH 2.7). More meaningful is the information regarding under which PH2S -pH conditions the P110 grade becomes fully resistant to SSC (threshold stress >= 90% YS). The remaining part of the study was devoted to obtaining this information through the use of the EFC 16 guidelines. Keywords: Sulfide Stress Cracking, Carbon Steel, Test Methods.
The purpose of the study was to assess the relative degree of severity of the test methods that are available to determine the Sulfide Stress Cracking (SSC) resistance of oilfield tubulars. Three different steel grades were used: a Sour Service Line Pipe grade (X65), a Sour Service OCTG grade (T95) and a non sour service OCTG grade (P110). The SSC threshold stresses of these steels were obtained in the NACE TM0177 solution A through Tensile Tests, C-Ring Tests, and Four Point Bent Beam Tests. The two Sour Service grades exhibited high threshold stress values ( >= 90% YS) whatever the test method that was used. Not unsurprisingly the non-Sour Service grade P110 gave much lower values ( < 40%YS). The exact threshold stress values depended on the test method, the tensile test being the most conservative of all with a threshold stress below 10% YS. This first part of the study allowed us to rank the test methods in terms of severity. However, for a non Sour service grade the exact value of the threshold stress itself is of little interest for the user. It is not practical nor even possible to reduce the stress level in service, and therefore the only conclusion that can be drawn from the P110 test results is that the material is not fit for service in the conditions of NACE TM0177 solution A (PH2S 1bar, pH 2.7). More meaningful is the information regarding under which PH2S -pH conditions the P110 grade becomes fully resistant to SSC (threshold stress >= 90% YS). The remaining part of the study was devoted to obtaining this information through the use of the EFC 16 guidelines. Keywords: Sulfide Stress Cracking, Carbon Steel, Test Methods.
PRICE BREAKS - The more you buy, the more you save
Quantity
1+
5+
Price
$20.00
$20.00
Product tags
Also Purchased
Picture for 08115 Development of a C125 High Strength Low Alloy Steel for OCTG: SSC Mapping in Slightly Sour Environment
Available for download

08115 Development of a C125 High Strength Low Alloy Steel for OCTG: SSC Mapping in Slightly Sour Environment

Product Number: 51300-08115-SG
ISBN: 08115 2008 CP
Author: Hervé Marchebois / Michel Piette / Laurent Ladeuille / David Senegas-Rouviere /Christoph Bosch / Josef Pleschiutschnig / Jean Leyer / Bertine Orlans-Joliet / Etienne Lepine / Frédéric Legay / Cédric Linne / Alfredo Figueiredo
Publication Date: 2008
$20.00

Today a need for a C125 Sulfide Stress Cracking (SSC) resistant material exists with the development of High Pressure/High Temperature (HP/HT) oil and gas fields.  This paper focuses on the SS resistance of industrial heats.
Picture for High strength steel SSC evaluation in mild sour environments at ambient and high temperatures
Available for download

51318-10920-High strength steel SSC evaluation in mild sour environments at ambient and high temperatures

Product Number: 51318-10920-SG
Author: James Wei / Manuel Gonzalez / Brian Chambers / Boris Thomas
Publication Date: 2018
$20.00

There is an increasing need to define the operating envelope for materials typically used as oil country tubular goods. This paper reports results of sulfide stress cracking (SSC) tests that were performed in mild sour environment at temperatures below 107°C.
Picture for SSC Resistance Testing of Heavy Wall Large-Diameter Pipes using Full-Size Four-Point Bend Tests and DCB Tests
Available for download

51318-10669-SSC Resistance Testing of Heavy Wall Large-Diameter Pipes using Full-Size Four-Point Bend Tests and DCB Tests

Product Number: 51318-10669-SG
Author: Thomas Haase / Christoph Bosch / Jens Schröder / Christoph Kalwa
Publication Date: 2018
$20.00

SSC testing was performed using transverse full-size four-point bend specimens with a thickness up to 35 mm at loads up to 90 % of the actual yield strength. Finite element simulations analyzed the stress distribution under high load.
Categories
Industry
Recently viewed
Popular tags
View all

Association for Materials Protection and Performance

© AMPP All Rights Reserved.
Membership Terms of Content Use
Contact Customer Support