Server maintenance is scheduled for Saturday, December 21st between 6am-10am CST.
During that time, parts of our website will be affected until maintenance is completed. Thank you for your patience.
Use GIVING24 at checkout to save 20% on eCourses and books (some exclusions apply)!
SSC testing was performed using transverse full-size four-point bend specimens with a thickness up to 35 mm at loads up to 90 % of the actual yield strength. Finite element simulations analyzed the stress distribution under high load.
Resistance testing of steel to Sulfide Stress Cracking (SSC) can be performed according to the four methods given in NACE standard TM0177. However, for SSC testing of low alloyed line pipe steel for longitudinally submerged-arc welded (SAWL) large-diameter pipes of a grade up to X65 it is well established to conduct four-point bend tests according to the new NACE TM0316 standard on machined test specimens with reduced thickness. SSC testing was performed using transverse full-size four-point bend specimens with a thickness up to 35 mm, machined from base material and longitudinal weld, at loads up to 90 % of the actual yield strength of the pipe material. Finite element simulations have been made in order to analyze the stress distribution in the full-size four-point bend specimen under the high load present during the test.
The NACE TM0177 Method D “Double Cantilever Beam” (DCB) corrosion test is frequently used for the determination of the fracture toughness of higher strength steels such as Oil Country Tubular Goods
(OCTG) in sour environments, which is represented by the KIssc value. In this study DCB testing was performed on X52 SAWL line pipe steel and the results are reported with regard to the requirements of the test method.
Key words: Four-Point Bend Test, SSC, DCB Test
New in-situ HIC measurement method to make the connection between HIC propagation behavior and microstructure. Based on an automatic ultrasonic wave inspection system and a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observation.
We are unable to complete this action. Please try again at a later time.
If this error continues to occur, please contact AMPP Customer Support for assistance.
Error Message:
Please login to use Standards Credits*
* AMPP Members receive Standards Credits in order to redeem eligible Standards and Reports in the Store
You are not a Member.
AMPP Members enjoy many benefits, including Standards Credits which can be used to redeem eligible Standards and Reports in the Store.
You can visit the Membership Page to learn about the benefits of membership.
You have previously purchased this item.
Go to Downloadable Products in your AMPP Store profile to find this item.
You do not have sufficient Standards Credits to claim this item.
Click on 'ADD TO CART' to purchase this item.
Your Standards Credit(s)
1
Remaining Credits
0
Please review your transaction.
Click on 'REDEEM' to use your Standards Credits to claim this item.
You have successfully redeemed:
Go to Downloadable Products in your AMPP Store Profile to find and download this item.
Design issues with well casing Cathodic Protection - CP. Need for and benefits of CP discussed. Case history dealing with design issues and what solutions were available and utilized.
CP Interference and CP Influence and how the two differ. Both will be demonstrated by case histories and some solutions will be presented.