Server maintenance is scheduled for Saturday, December 21st between 6am-10am CST.

During that time, parts of our website will be affected until maintenance is completed. Thank you for your patience.

Menu
Search
Filters
Close
Menu

51318-11283-Using inspection data to calibrate historic-based likelihood of failure models for lateral piping

  • /
  • 51318-11283-Using inspection data to calibrate historic-based likelihood of failure models for lateral piping
Picture for Using inspection data to calibrate historic-based likelihood of failure models for lateral piping
Available for download

The use of calibration of the historic-based model with the inspection data available to provide a less conservative and more accurate assessment of the likelihood of failure for lateral piping without inspection data.

Product Number: 51318-11283-SG
Author: Amanda Kulhawy / Alex Nemeth / Janine Woo / Sherif Hassanien
Publication Date: 2018
$0.00
$20.00
$20.00

In order to make risk-informed decisions when designing corrosion mitigation and remediation programs for lateral piping, consequence and likelihood of a failure (LoF) are required to estimate the risk. Within industry, lateral piping does not always have In-Line Inspection (ILI) or Direct Assessment (DA) data. As such, the LoF models for corrosion on uninspected lateral piping rely on a semi-quantitative historic-based approach. This approach leverages a historic failure rate and modification factors to provide a lateral-specific rate of failure (Rf). However, when lateral piping has been inspected, a quantitative assessment can be applied to evaluate LoF. Based on a sample assessment on laterals with inspection data, the historic-based model showed more conservative LoF results. This conservatism could potentially drive unnecessary mitigation or remediation work on lateral piping where inspection data may not be available. This paper considers the use of calibration of the historic-based model with the inspection data available to provide a less conservative and more accurate assessment of the likelihood of failure for lateral piping without inspection data. Given the limitations and constraints in the data and models, it proposes the use of risk-informed decision making to develop the integrity management plan.

Key words: Risk-informed, lateral, piping, integrity management, historic-based, probability of failure, likelihood of failure

In order to make risk-informed decisions when designing corrosion mitigation and remediation programs for lateral piping, consequence and likelihood of a failure (LoF) are required to estimate the risk. Within industry, lateral piping does not always have In-Line Inspection (ILI) or Direct Assessment (DA) data. As such, the LoF models for corrosion on uninspected lateral piping rely on a semi-quantitative historic-based approach. This approach leverages a historic failure rate and modification factors to provide a lateral-specific rate of failure (Rf). However, when lateral piping has been inspected, a quantitative assessment can be applied to evaluate LoF. Based on a sample assessment on laterals with inspection data, the historic-based model showed more conservative LoF results. This conservatism could potentially drive unnecessary mitigation or remediation work on lateral piping where inspection data may not be available. This paper considers the use of calibration of the historic-based model with the inspection data available to provide a less conservative and more accurate assessment of the likelihood of failure for lateral piping without inspection data. Given the limitations and constraints in the data and models, it proposes the use of risk-informed decision making to develop the integrity management plan.

Key words: Risk-informed, lateral, piping, integrity management, historic-based, probability of failure, likelihood of failure

Product tags
Also Purchased
Picture for 51318-11271- AC Corrosion Control: When Too Much Cathodic Protection Might Just be a Bad Thing!
Available for download

51318-11271- AC Corrosion Control: When Too Much Cathodic Protection Might Just be a Bad Thing!

Product Number: 51318-11271-SG
Author: Dale Lindemuth / Dan Crabtree
Publication Date: 2018
$20.00

Case histories where throttling down the cathodic protection was evaluated to determine the impact on reducing the AC corrosion threat. Includes the use of fast-response electrical resistance corrosion rate probe monitoring technology.
Picture for 51318-11274-Research on Current and Potential Distribution of Horizontal Directional Drilling Pipeline
Available for download

51318-11274-Research on Current and Potential Distribution of Horizontal Directional Drilling Pipeline

Product Number: 51318-11274-SG
Author: Xu Huatian / Zhang Lianjun / Bi Wuxi / Liu Zhenbin
Publication Date: 2018
$20.00

Laboratory and field experiment results show that the soil resistivity is the main influencing factor of the cathodic protection current distribution of horizontal directional drilling. This article also gives a test method for effectiveness of cathodic protection of HDD.
Picture for Repassivation behavior of lean duplex stainless steels in chloride and thiosulfate environments
Available for download

51318-11273-Repassivation behavior of lean duplex stainless steels in chloride and thiosulfate environments

Product Number: 51318-11273-SG
Author: Liang He / Preet M. Singh
Publication Date: 2018
$20.00

In this paper, the repassivation kinetics of lean duplex stainless steels in environments containing chloride as well as thiosulfate ions was studied through the scratch test method.
Categories
Industry
Recently viewed
Popular tags
View all

Association for Materials Protection and Performance

© AMPP All Rights Reserved.
Membership Terms of Content Use
Contact Customer Support