Server maintenance is scheduled for Saturday, December 21st between 6am-10am CST.

During that time, parts of our website will be affected until maintenance is completed. Thank you for your patience.

Menu
Search
Filters
Close
Menu

Use GIVING24 at checkout to save 20% on eCourses and books (some exclusions apply)!

51318-10909-Rapid Assessment of Station Piping CP Effectiveness In High Resistivity Environments

Picture for Rapid Assessment of Station Piping CP Effectiveness In High Resistivity Environments
Available for download

Buried station piping at a pipeline pump facility experienced low structure-to-electrolyte potentials after cathodic protection (CP) system commissioning. This paper describes the quick response soil side ER corrosion probe system, data collection, and data analysis.

Product Number: 51318-10909-SG
Author: Paul Murray / Naeem Khan
Publication Date: 2018
Industry: Corrosion Monitoring and Control
$0.00
$20.00
$20.00

Buried station piping at a pipeline pump facility with high soil resistivity experienced sub-criterion structure-to-electrolyte potentials post cathodic protection (CP) system commissioning. A prompt assessment of the external corrosion threat was required to determine if supplemental CP would be required, or if operating with sub-criterion structure-to-electrolyte potentials would be acceptable. One option to quantify the external corrosion threat on metallic structures is to utilize soil side electrical resistance (ER) corrosion probes. The corrosion growth rate obtained from soil side ER corrosion probes can be used to determine part of the external corrosion threat when CP system effectiveness is inadequate. However, soil side ER corrosion probes typically require a 12-month measurement time frame to establish representative corrosion growth rates. In this review, the project construction team needed to understand within a 3-month time frame if supplemental CP systems were required to alleviate sub-criterion structure-to-electrolyte potentials. A specialized soil side ER corrosion probe monitoring system was installed to obtain rapid corrosion growth rate data, which was used to determine the external corrosion threat being experienced on the buried station piping. This paper describes the quick response soil side ER corrosion probe system, data collection, and data analysis, and the decision-making process to not install supplemental CP systems. Additionally, the operating soil side ER corrosion probe data collected following the initial 3-month decision window is reported to validate the decision to operate with the sub-criterion structure-to-electrolyte potentials. However, at the end of the data collection period, anomalous results were found, which have been flagged for future investigation.

Key words: Buried station piping, high resistivity environment, CP criterion, soil side electrical resistance (ER) corrosion probe

Buried station piping at a pipeline pump facility with high soil resistivity experienced sub-criterion structure-to-electrolyte potentials post cathodic protection (CP) system commissioning. A prompt assessment of the external corrosion threat was required to determine if supplemental CP would be required, or if operating with sub-criterion structure-to-electrolyte potentials would be acceptable. One option to quantify the external corrosion threat on metallic structures is to utilize soil side electrical resistance (ER) corrosion probes. The corrosion growth rate obtained from soil side ER corrosion probes can be used to determine part of the external corrosion threat when CP system effectiveness is inadequate. However, soil side ER corrosion probes typically require a 12-month measurement time frame to establish representative corrosion growth rates. In this review, the project construction team needed to understand within a 3-month time frame if supplemental CP systems were required to alleviate sub-criterion structure-to-electrolyte potentials. A specialized soil side ER corrosion probe monitoring system was installed to obtain rapid corrosion growth rate data, which was used to determine the external corrosion threat being experienced on the buried station piping. This paper describes the quick response soil side ER corrosion probe system, data collection, and data analysis, and the decision-making process to not install supplemental CP systems. Additionally, the operating soil side ER corrosion probe data collected following the initial 3-month decision window is reported to validate the decision to operate with the sub-criterion structure-to-electrolyte potentials. However, at the end of the data collection period, anomalous results were found, which have been flagged for future investigation.

Key words: Buried station piping, high resistivity environment, CP criterion, soil side electrical resistance (ER) corrosion probe

Product tags
Also Purchased
Picture for 06163 CATHODIC PROTECTION OF PIPELINES
Available for download

06163 CATHODIC PROTECTION OF PIPELINES IN HIGH RESISTIVITY SOILS AND THE EFFECT OF SEASONAL CHANGES

Product Number: 51300-06163-SG
ISBN: 06163 2006 CP
Author: Fraser King, Greg Van Boven, P, Nichols, Rod Reid, Kurt Lawson and Neil Thompson
Publication Date: 2006
$20.00

The effect of seasonal changes on the protection of pipelines in high-resistivity soil. The nature and magnitude of the seasonal fluctuations. Corrosion rates are low even when compliance with a given CP criterion cannot be demonstrated.
Picture for Equalization Currents and Metallic IR Drop: Impediments to True Potential Measurements
Available for download

51318-10907-Equalization Currents and Metallic IR Drop: Impediments to True Potential Measurements

Product Number: 51318-10907-SG
Author: Daniel Fingas / Jean-Patrick Boudreault / Derek Leach
Publication Date: 2018
$20.00

Recent close-interval potential surveys have raised concerns about the accuracy of potential measurements on older, poorly-coated pipelines. Two sources of error were identified: metallic IR-drops and equalization currents.

 
Picture for Cathodic Protection Design Considerations in Congested Area Facilities
Available for download

51318-10900-Cathodic Protection Design Considerations in Congested Area Facilities

Product Number: 51318-10900-SG
Author: Pavan K. Shukla / Andrew Nordquist / James Kulczyk
Publication Date: 2018
$20.00

A 3D computer model estimates CP current distribution in congested areas with coated and uncoated buried pipelines, screwpiles, groundwires and copper groundrods. The model enables design and installation of  optimal CP systems for the below grade pipelines.
Categories
Industry
Recently viewed
Popular tags
View all

Association for Materials Protection and Performance

© AMPP All Rights Reserved.
Membership Terms of Content Use
Contact Customer Support