Menu
Search
Filters
Close
Menu

How A Single-Coat, Non-Hazardous Epoxy Saves Charlotte Water Money In The Long Run

How a Single Coat, Non-Hazardous Epoxy Saves Charlotte Water Money in the Long Run
Available for download

CLTWater is one of the largest water entities in the Southeast region, managing a total of ten water and wastewater treatment plants serving a population of approximately one million. The MCWWMF is the largest wastewater treatment plant of five wastewater facilities owned and operated by CLTWater, rated at a 64 MGD treatment capacity and accounting for over half of CLTWater’s wastewater treatment system. 

Product Number: 51322-17988-SG
Author: David Adams, J.B. Conant
Publication Date: 2022
Industries: Water/Wastewater , Coatings
$0.00
$20.00
$20.00

The McAlpine Creek Wastewater Management Facility (MCWWMF) is the largest wastewater treatment facility operated by Charlotte Water (CLTWater). In 2018, CLTWater began a Reliability and Process Improvements project. The project involved the rehabilitation of 16 secondary concrete clarifiers that ranged from 95 to 150 feet in diameter, with the oldest clarifiers being nearly 60 years old.

CLTWater considered an epoxy coating. However, they historically ran into issues with failures of delamination. Thus, they opted to move forward with a pilot study with four different epoxy manufacturers where they analyzed cost, schedule, performance, quality, service life, and safety. Concluding the test, CLTWater determined the single coat epoxy to provide the best value for their project.

The McAlpine Creek Wastewater Management Facility (MCWWMF) is the largest wastewater treatment facility operated by Charlotte Water (CLTWater). In 2018, CLTWater began a Reliability and Process Improvements project. The project involved the rehabilitation of 16 secondary concrete clarifiers that ranged from 95 to 150 feet in diameter, with the oldest clarifiers being nearly 60 years old.

CLTWater considered an epoxy coating. However, they historically ran into issues with failures of delamination. Thus, they opted to move forward with a pilot study with four different epoxy manufacturers where they analyzed cost, schedule, performance, quality, service life, and safety. Concluding the test, CLTWater determined the single coat epoxy to provide the best value for their project.

Product tags
Also Purchased
Picture for Guideline To Determine Erosional Velocity For Liquid Hydrocarbon Transmission Pipelines
Available for download

Guideline To Determine Erosional Velocity For Liquid Hydrocarbon Transmission Pipelines

Product Number: 51322-17812-SG
Author: Jose Vera, Francois Ayello, Guanlan Liu, Richard Eckert, Prabhas Bhat
Publication Date: 2022
$20.00

Erosion is a major threat to liquid hydrocarbon transmission pipeline integrity when high liquid flow ratesare combined with the presence of solid particles. However, there is currently no generally acceptedguidance document or standard by which liquid petroleum pipeline operators can define maximum allowable velocities to manage the threat of erosion in their pipelines.
How The Right Pot Choice And System Set Up Can Improve Blasting Efficiency Continued
Available for download

How The Right Pot Choice And System Set Up Can Improve Blasting Efficiency Continued

Product Number: 51322-17932-SG
Author: David J Barnes
Publication Date: 2022
$20.00

The paper written in 2019 concluded the following; Whilst we may think that all blast pots are the same, these tests show that not to be the case. The design of the pipework, remote control valves and media valves all contribute to the efficiency of the pot. The ability to precisely control the amount of grit being introduced into the airstream gives the operator much more control over grit usage and therefore overall efficiency and hence cost. 
High Temperature Corrosion Resistance Of Alloy N07740 In Solar And Low Emission Ultrasupercritical Power Generation
Available for download

High Temperature Corrosion Resistance Of Alloy N07740 In Solar And Low Emission Ultrasupercritical Power Generation

Product Number: 51322-17945-SG
Author: Stephen McCoy, John deBarbadillo, Brian Baker, Mark Anderson
Publication Date: 2022
$20.00

In recent years, solar energy technology has received particular emphasis in the interest of reducing CO2 emissions.  Concentrated solar power (CSP) technology received an initial boost from the installation of nine parabolic trough-based electricity-generating systems totaling 354 megawatts of capacity in the 1980’s.  Solar One, operational in 1982 and supported by the DOE and an industrial consortium, illustrate utilization of a circulating heat transfer fluid to produce steam to drive a turbine generating electricity.  Solar Two in 1996 demonstrated energy storage so that solar power could be generated during the night.1  In the ensuing decades, additional capacity has increasingly been installed worldwide, comprised primarily of both parabolic trough and central tower CSP technologies,  As of 2019, global installed capacity totaled 6.2 GW, with an additional 21 GWh planned of installed thermal energy storage (TES) comprised primarily of molten salts.   
Categories
Industry
Recently viewed
Popular tags
View all

Association for Materials Protection and Performance

© AMPP All Rights Reserved.
Membership Terms of Content Use
Contact Customer Support