Search
Filters
Close

Field Experience On Why Pipeline In-Line Inspections (ILI) Fail

Product Number: 51321-16884-SG
Author: Itoro L. Akrasi; Mohammad S. Hamaqi; Tawfiq I. Hathloul; Abdullah F. Almakinzi; Abdulaziz A. Naim
Publication Date: 2021
$0.00
$20.00
$20.00

Pipeline in-line inspection (ILI) is a reliable technique to evaluate and assess the integrity of pipelines.
Multiple technologies are currently deployed for ILI. The most widely used include; Magnetic Flux leakage (MFL), Ultrasonic (UT), Electromagnetic Acoustic Transducer (EMAT) and Eddy Current (EC). ILI is used to identify different anomalies and defects, to prevent pipeline leaks or ruptures that will result in production loss and/or adverse environmental impact. Extensive planning is required before running an ILI tool in a pipeline. Even with extensive and rigorous planning between pipeline owners/operators and the ILI vendors, some ILI runs fail. This paper will discuss field experience as to why some pipeline ILI runs fail. It will also discuss key factors to consider during pre-planning and preparation, to minimize the potential for ILI failure. Several of these factors include understanding all pipeline physical parameters, compliance with ILI vendor tool operational limits; such as magnetization capability, velocity, differential pressure and temperature requirements, and compliance with sound operational practices for launching and receiving of ILI tools. It is essential to identify the root cause(s) of an ILI failure to avoid reoccurrence.

Pipeline in-line inspection (ILI) is a reliable technique to evaluate and assess the integrity of pipelines.
Multiple technologies are currently deployed for ILI. The most widely used include; Magnetic Flux leakage (MFL), Ultrasonic (UT), Electromagnetic Acoustic Transducer (EMAT) and Eddy Current (EC). ILI is used to identify different anomalies and defects, to prevent pipeline leaks or ruptures that will result in production loss and/or adverse environmental impact. Extensive planning is required before running an ILI tool in a pipeline. Even with extensive and rigorous planning between pipeline owners/operators and the ILI vendors, some ILI runs fail. This paper will discuss field experience as to why some pipeline ILI runs fail. It will also discuss key factors to consider during pre-planning and preparation, to minimize the potential for ILI failure. Several of these factors include understanding all pipeline physical parameters, compliance with ILI vendor tool operational limits; such as magnetization capability, velocity, differential pressure and temperature requirements, and compliance with sound operational practices for launching and receiving of ILI tools. It is essential to identify the root cause(s) of an ILI failure to avoid reoccurrence.

Also Purchased
Picture for 04182 ILI Reporting for Pipeline Integrity
Available for download

04182 ILI Reporting for Pipeline Integrity Management Programs

Product Number: 51300-04182-SG
ISBN: 04182 2004 CP
Author: Martin Phillips, Daniel Soenjoto, Michiel P. Brongers, and Patrick H. Vieth, CC Technologies Inc.
$20.00
Picture for Internal Corrosion Threat Assessment Using Operational Data and Comparison with ILI Results
Available for download

Internal Corrosion Threat Assessment Using Operational Data and Comparison with ILI Results

Product Number: 51315-6001-SG
ISBN: 6001 2015 CP
Author: Dharma Abayarathna
Publication Date: 2015
$20.00
Picture for 01627 PIPELINE CORROSION MANAGEMENT
Available for download

01627 PIPELINE CORROSION MANAGEMENT

Product Number: 51300-01627-SG
ISBN: 01627 2001 CP
Author: Jane Dawson, Julia Race, Stephen Peet and Ravi Krishnamurthy
$20.00