Server maintenance is scheduled for Saturday, December 21st between 6am-10am CST.

During that time, parts of our website will be affected until maintenance is completed. Thank you for your patience.

Menu
Search
Filters
Close
Menu

Durability Assessment of Foul-release Coatings

Durability Assessment of Foul-release Coatings
Available for download

The Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) is currently investigating the feasibility of using foul-release coatings to mitigate impacts caused by macro-fouling organisms such as zebra and quagga mussels.  Durability of these coatings must be considered as a factor in determining overall life cycle costs.  To this end, the Bureau of Reclamation has developed testing protocols to evaluate the durability of foul-release coatings with respect to abrasion, erosion resistance and the ability to overcoat existing equipment.  

Product Number: 41212-715-SG
Author: David Tordonato, Dr. Allen Skaja
Publication Date: 2012
Industries: Coatings , Corrosion Monitoring and Control , Coatings and Linings
$0.00
$20.00
$20.00

The Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) is currently investigating the feasibility of using foul-release coatings to mitigate impacts caused by macro-fouling organisms such as zebra and quagga mussels.  Durability of these coatings must be considered as a factor in determining overall life cycle costs.  To this end, the Bureau of Reclamation has developed testing protocols to evaluate the durability of foul-release coatings with respect to abrasion, erosion resistance and the ability to overcoat existing equipment.  This paper details each testing methodology and presents results.  The tests show a wide variation in the durability of commercially available foulrelease coatings.  In order to estimate the expected product life for specific service environments, the results are compared to several benchmark coatings which have an extensive service history within Reclamation. These results show that silicone coatings have the potential to work under certain conditions where floating debris is not present.  Silicone epoxy and polyurethane systems are more durable but less resistant to erosion damage caused by entrained particulates such as sand.  None of the coating systems are recommend as an overcoat material for coal tar enamel.

The Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) is currently investigating the feasibility of using foul-release coatings to mitigate impacts caused by macro-fouling organisms such as zebra and quagga mussels.  Durability of these coatings must be considered as a factor in determining overall life cycle costs.  To this end, the Bureau of Reclamation has developed testing protocols to evaluate the durability of foul-release coatings with respect to abrasion, erosion resistance and the ability to overcoat existing equipment.  This paper details each testing methodology and presents results.  The tests show a wide variation in the durability of commercially available foulrelease coatings.  In order to estimate the expected product life for specific service environments, the results are compared to several benchmark coatings which have an extensive service history within Reclamation. These results show that silicone coatings have the potential to work under certain conditions where floating debris is not present.  Silicone epoxy and polyurethane systems are more durable but less resistant to erosion damage caused by entrained particulates such as sand.  None of the coating systems are recommend as an overcoat material for coal tar enamel.

Product tags
Also Purchased
Effect of Additional Water-Jet Cleaning on the Surface Cleanliness and Coating Performance
Available for download

Effect of Additional Water-Jet Cleaning on the Surface Cleanliness and Coating Performance

Product Number: 51219-202-SG
Author: Heebaek Lee, Eunha Song
Publication Date: 2019
$20.00

The objective of surface preparation is to create proper adhesion of a coating over the substrate. Proper surface preparation is vital to the long life and effectiveness of a coating applied in corrosive service. In some projects, the owners ask for the additional water jet cleaning prior to blasting work. 
Effect of Surface Conditioning on Corrosion Resistance Using New Vs. Traditional Abrasive Blasting Media Types
Available for download

Effect of Surface Conditioning on Corrosion Resistance Using New Vs. Traditional Abrasive Blasting Media Types

Product Number: 51220-291-SG
Author: Wesley S. Towle, Paul W. Rehrig, Ed R. Reitz, Rafi M. Herskovits
Publication Date: 2020
$20.00

Surface conditioning is the first step in building efficient corrosion protection on a part or structure. Key concerns during this step include, how to create a stronger anchor-profile and how to efficiently remove previously coated, damaged, or corroded elements from a materials surface prior to coating. The ideal solution must consider three areas of the surface conditioning process: finish quality, cleaning efficiency and total cost. 
Picture for Epoxy/Silicone: The Ecological Evolution of Speed, Efficiency and Durability in High Performance Marine Coatings
Available for download

Epoxy/Silicone: The Ecological Evolution of Speed, Efficiency and Durability in High Performance Marine Coatings

Product Number: 41212-676-SG
Author: Duane Palmateer, Ian Germain, John Kilgour
Publication Date: 2012
$20.00

Success with the elite sailing world coincided with a renewed interest in the rest of the marine industry to find high performance, non-toxic coatings for commercial and recreational ship hulls. It begged the question of could the technology be applicable to shipping where clean hulls, fuel efficiency and durability are the primary performance requirements.
Categories
Industry
Recently viewed
Popular tags
View all

Association for Materials Protection and Performance

© AMPP All Rights Reserved.
Membership Terms of Content Use
Contact Customer Support