Save 20% on select titles with code HIDDEN24 - Shop The Sale Now
In this paper, a detailed analysis was performed to define the variance between both Nickel alloys 825 and 625 Multi-alloys. A comprehensive experiment and testing was done to evaluate both mechanical and chemical properties for the flanges with weld overlay, fittings and pipe components. The results of the study indicated several challenges and the gaps between both materials. Therefore, an initiative was led to promote the current process in order to prevent reoccurrence and mitigate associated consequences of failure by investigating and defining the root cause analysis. In order to ensure bridging the gaps, the paper concludes with a list of recommendations for the actions taken towards the material and vendor quality in order to proceed forward with the corrective actions and precautions for utilization whenever different PMI readings are found in cladding to continue supplying high quality products as expected.
Within many features of the Electro Slag Strip Cladding (ESSC) technique, one of the most attractive is the opportunity to achieve a required clad metal chemical analysis in one single layer. All these CRA 308L, 316L, 347, 625 & 825 types frequently concern fabricators who are constantly demanding for ways to reduce production costs & thicknesses of CRA. Hence, new low dilution and high-travel speed solutions have been developed with the aim to reduce the thickness and/or the number of layers in order to answer to industry expectations in terms of productivity. Through controlling dilution with the parent metal and balancing the chemistry by means of the new fluxes, it has been possible to achieve high quality results with an iron content Fe <7% & Fe < 10% for 625 cladding in a single layer where traditional ESSC requires two layers for the same objective. Also, for Alloy 825, single and thin layer solutions have been achieved. This subject presents an overview of these new developments with details on the applied welding conditions and the quantitative results achieved, showing benefits in terms of material savings and productivity gains.
We are unable to complete this action. Please try again at a later time.
If this error continues to occur, please contact AMPP Customer Support for assistance.
Error Message:
Please login to use Standards Credits*
* AMPP Members receive Standards Credits in order to redeem eligible Standards and Reports in the Store
You are not a Member.
AMPP Members enjoy many benefits, including Standards Credits which can be used to redeem eligible Standards and Reports in the Store.
You can visit the Membership Page to learn about the benefits of membership.
You have previously purchased this item.
Go to Downloadable Products in your AMPP Store profile to find this item.
You do not have sufficient Standards Credits to claim this item.
Click on 'ADD TO CART' to purchase this item.
Your Standards Credit(s)
1
Remaining Credits
0
Please review your transaction.
Click on 'REDEEM' to use your Standards Credits to claim this item.
You have successfully redeemed:
Go to Downloadable Products in your AMPP Store Profile to find and download this item.
Test results for four alloys in six different sour environments are presented. Alloys 625, 825, 316L and carbon steel were testing in sour gas with varying exposure to moisture at 280°C. Corrosion rates for each alloy over a 30 day period are measured from mass and thickness changes.
Nickel alloys UNS N06625, UNS N06059, UNS N06022, UNS N08825 and one Special Stainless Steel (UNS N08031) are overlay welded in 1 to 3 layers on carbon steel. The dilution is measured and results of pitting corrosion in an immersion test with “Green Death” solution will be discussed.