Server maintenance is scheduled for Saturday, December 21st between 6am-10am CST.
During that time, parts of our website will be affected until maintenance is completed. Thank you for your patience.
Use GIVING24 at checkout to save 20% on eCourses and books (some exclusions apply)!
Coatings are a composite blend of raw ingredients that are mixed, applied to a prepared substrate, and dried and cured correctly to perform to their maximum capability. Failures and defects can appear themselves at numerous times in the life of a coating. Prior to application, they can take the shape of settlement and skinning, during application as runs and sags, shortly after application as solvent popping and orange peel, and during service as blistering and rust spotting. Therefore, it is not unexpected that those coatings can suffer from premature failure and/or exhibit defects that may or may not result in failure. Coatings nowadays are the most efficient method to shield metals and thus has been widely engaged among various protective techniques 1, 2.
Coating system of a cargo container belonging to a high-profile cargo company failed terribly during service at the humid south gulf coastline. The failure occurred during the summer of 2020 after only 8 months of service. The container had an acknowledged life expectancy of 20 years. An investigation commission was appointed to investigate the root causes of the coating failure. Visual inspection revealed checking and cracking all over the container surfaces including surface rust and rust stains at damaged/cracked locations. Holiday testing revealed multiple holidays/voids for the coating examined at various locations of the container. Dry film coating thickness was also carried out and it showed several locations which were undercoated or excessively over coated. Pencil hardness test was carried out on several locations and it should surface roughness/hardness. A section of coating removed from the container surfaces was randomly taken and analyzed using SEM/EDS technique to see the different layers of the coating and to check the constituents at the base of the coating where the base metal layer was also visible. Pull off adhesion testing carried out on the limited sampling showed at least two out of five readings which did not meet the specification limits for adhesion compliance. Tests conducted below the failed coating system showed evidence of high levels of salt. Flexibility test was performed to check the flexibility of the coating. The failure mechanisms were discussed and good engineering practices were put forward to combat and mitigate poor adhesion and inhomogeneous coating application.
Plant assets for hydrocarbon and power generation systems are prone to numerous damage mechanisms that arise from operating and/or upset conditions, environmental factors, material defects as well as other neighborhood factors 1-2. Corrosion is one of the key degradations that pose a substantial economic burden, and may result in severe safety and environmental hazards 3. While considering the percentage for global economy in terms of corrosion, the total cost of corrosion globally amounts to ∼2.5 trillion US dollars per year. Among the corrosion mitigation measures, organic protective coatings are the most widely used, and their costs add up to two-thirds of all anti-corrosion overheads 4.
We are unable to complete this action. Please try again at a later time.
If this error continues to occur, please contact AMPP Customer Support for assistance.
Error Message:
Please login to use Standards Credits*
* AMPP Members receive Standards Credits in order to redeem eligible Standards and Reports in the Store
You are not a Member.
AMPP Members enjoy many benefits, including Standards Credits which can be used to redeem eligible Standards and Reports in the Store.
You can visit the Membership Page to learn about the benefits of membership.
You have previously purchased this item.
Go to Downloadable Products in your AMPP Store profile to find this item.
You do not have sufficient Standards Credits to claim this item.
Click on 'ADD TO CART' to purchase this item.
Your Standards Credit(s)
1
Remaining Credits
0
Please review your transaction.
Click on 'REDEEM' to use your Standards Credits to claim this item.
You have successfully redeemed:
Go to Downloadable Products in your AMPP Store Profile to find and download this item.
This paper presents the diagnostic work undertaken to determine the cause of failing coating and spalling block on the exterior of a commercial building in northern Illinois. The field assessment methods used to diagnose the problems including non-destructive and destructive methods for determining moisture content in the masonry, infrared thermography, and visual assessments are described.
EN Engineering (ENE) completed an AC interference study over 68 miles of an operator’s transmission line. In addition, an ACVG survey of approximately one (1) mile of the pipeline was conducted at the take-off point of the 8” line. As a result of this AC interference study, evidence of elevated AC corrosion risk has not been found on the operator’s pipeline. However, a review of the provided data shows evidence of DC interference due to a nearby foreign rectifier groundbed at the take-off point of the operator’s line.