Server maintenance is scheduled for Saturday, December 21st between 6am-10am CST.

During that time, parts of our website will be affected until maintenance is completed. Thank you for your patience.

Menu
Search
Filters
Close
Menu

Analysis of leak repair testing requirements in ASME PCC-2 and ISO 24817

Picture for Analysis of leak repair testing requirements in ASME PCC-2 and ISO 24817
Available for download

Corrosion in metallic industrial equipment, pipework, and vessels, when left unchecked, can lead to the full deterioration of wall-thickness. The presence of through-wall defects may lead to loss of production and costly shutdowns, in addition to environmental and safety hazards. One solution to this issue is the installation of a repair system using composite materials, which are durable for decades, easy to install, and a cost-effective to deploy option for bringing industrial equipment back to operation, even after a leak is detected. Internationally recognized organizations, such as ASME and ISO, set the rules for the design methodology, material testing, and training of personnel for this type of repair method.

Product Number: 51323-18934-SG
Author: Pedro Bordieri, Casey Whalen, Hanna Ford
Publication Date: 2023
$0.00
$20.00
$20.00

Part of the testing program that composite repair systems are required to undergo for qualification is the installation on pipes with various hole sizes and subsequent pressure tests. The objective of these tests is to determine the lower confidence level of the energy release rate (γLCL) of the repair system. A requirement set by the standards for calculating γLCL is that the failure must occur on the edges of the repair, rather than through its thickness. However, the layer count of the composite repair may be thicker than predicted mathematically in order to have consistent through-edge failure mode. This paper reviews recent testing programs that evaluated the leak sealing capabilities of composite repairs with various thicknesses and compares the results to estimated values, regardless of failure mode. The objective of this study is to determine if, under specific scenarios, repair thicknesses less than the minimum required to pass the test can be used effectively and conservatively. The results will be compared to mathematical estimates that also highlight some key differences between the ASME PCC-2 and ISO 24817 standards.

Part of the testing program that composite repair systems are required to undergo for qualification is the installation on pipes with various hole sizes and subsequent pressure tests. The objective of these tests is to determine the lower confidence level of the energy release rate (γLCL) of the repair system. A requirement set by the standards for calculating γLCL is that the failure must occur on the edges of the repair, rather than through its thickness. However, the layer count of the composite repair may be thicker than predicted mathematically in order to have consistent through-edge failure mode. This paper reviews recent testing programs that evaluated the leak sealing capabilities of composite repairs with various thicknesses and compares the results to estimated values, regardless of failure mode. The objective of this study is to determine if, under specific scenarios, repair thicknesses less than the minimum required to pass the test can be used effectively and conservatively. The results will be compared to mathematical estimates that also highlight some key differences between the ASME PCC-2 and ISO 24817 standards.

Product tags
Also Purchased
Picture for Considerations for Repairing Live Piping Using Engineered Composite Repair Systems
Available for download

51317--9494-Considerations for Repairing Live Piping Using Engineered Composite Repair Systems

Product Number: 51317--9494-SG
ISBN: 9494 2017 CP
Author: Matt Green
Publication Date: 2017
$20.00

Composite materials are being widely implemented for repair scenarios within refineries – domestically and around the world. This paper will discuss concerns, considerations, and needs typically encountered when using Engineered Composite Repair systems to repair live, operating piping systems in a plant environment.
Picture for COMPLIANCE TO ASME PCC-2 STANDARD FOR ENGINEERED COMPOSITE REPAIR SYSTEMS
Available for download

51318-10818-COMPLIANCE TO ASME PCC-2 STANDARD FOR ENGINEERED COMPOSITE REPAIR SYSTEMS

Product Number: 51318-10818-SG
Author: Matthew Green
Publication Date: 2018
$20.00

Key qualification and testing requirements, as well as a full implementation process as outlined within the ASME PCC-22, Article 4.1, Nonmetallic Composite Repair Systems: High Risk Applications.
Picture for Testing and Design of Nonmetallic Composite Repair Systems for Pipeline Intergity
Available for download

51317--9506-Testing and Design of Nonmetallic Composite Repair Systems for Pipeline Intergity

Product Number: 51317--9506-SG
ISBN: 9506 2017 CP
Author: Davie Peguero
Publication Date: 2017
$20.00

Pressure cycling and ultimate failure pressure testing was conducted on various pipe samples to verify the design formulas meet the specifications and are correct for use in design of field repairs. Results show that use of strain-based design methodologies for composite repair systems is suitable and effective.
Categories
Industry
Recently viewed
Popular tags
View all

Association for Materials Protection and Performance

© AMPP All Rights Reserved.
Membership Terms of Content Use
Contact Customer Support