Celebrate World Corrosion Awareness Day with 20% off eCourses and eBooks with code WCAD2024 at checkout!
Most companies involved in abrasive blasting are familiar with this iconic illustration, which shows the components of an abrasive-blast equipment set up. In this article, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations pertaining to each component are given.
Most companies involved in abrasive blasting are familiar with this iconic illustration, which shows the components of an abrasive-blast equipment set up. In this article, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations pertaining to each component are given. More than 40 references to hazards associated with abrasive blasting and coating operations appear in Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations published by OSHA. These references relate to pressure vessels, electrical classification, personal protective equipment (PPE), hazardous substances, and more. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) uses Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations to set standards for how contractors must control air emissions and solid waste generated during surface preparation and coating operations. Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations states the requirements of the Department of Transportation for control activities on public highways.
The creepage of corrosion underneath a coatings film applied to a steel test panel is often used as a performance test for the anti-corrosion properties of a coating system. Underfilm corrosion creep, also sometimes referred as scribe creep in the laboratory environment, is defined as the degree of corrosion emanating away from a scribe line underneath a coating film applied to a steel substrate.
We are unable to complete this action. Please try again at a later time.
If this error continues to occur, please contact AMPP Customer Support for assistance.
Use this error code for reference:
Please login to use Standards Credits*
* AMPP Members receive Standards Credits in order to redeem eligible Standards and Reports in the Store
You are not a Member.
AMPP Members enjoy many benefits, including Standards Credits which can be used to redeem eligible Standards and Reports in the Store.
You can visit the Membership Page to learn about the benefits of membership.
You have previously purchased this item.
Go to Downloadable Products in your AMPP Store profile to find this item.
You do not have sufficient Standards Credits to claim this item.
Click on 'ADD TO CART' to purchase this item.
Your Standards Credit(s)
1
Remaining Credits
0
Please review your transaction.
Click on 'REDEEM' to use your Standards Credits to claim this item.
You have successfully redeemed:
Go to Downloadable Products in your AMPP Store Profile to find and download this item.
Mineral abrasives such as glass bead and aluminum oxide have been traditionally used in the surface finishing industry. The general perception is that they offer acceptable cleaning at a low operating cost. Often dismissed is the potential of metallic alternatives that though seemingly higher in initial procurement cost, offer several differentiating advantages in terms of recyclability, consistency of finish, repeatable results and ultimately resulting in overall, reduced operating costs.
Pull-off adhesion behaviors of 15 coating systems in three groups were studied utilizing test method ASTM D4541. Three groups of coating systems included coating systems with organic or inorganic zinc-rich primers, polymeric polyurea coatings, and overcoating systems applied on an existing coating system.