Server maintenance is scheduled for Saturday, December 21st between 6am-10am CST.
During that time, parts of our website will be affected until maintenance is completed. Thank you for your patience.
Use GIVING24 at checkout to save 20% on eCourses and books (some exclusions apply)!
Acceptable “industry standard” for dissolving a silicate deposit is hydrofluoric acid. Here, we introduce a safer, more environmentallyfriendly el method for dissolving silicate scales and present a case study for its application in industry.
Silicate scale formation is a technical challenge for industrial process water operators and a financial burden for all industries that use water to support theiroperations.Silicates are mainly present in power-generating units such as boilers and condensers heat exchangers in refineries and petrochemical plants water desalination and other industrial equipment such as degreasers in paper mills. Wherever this scale is present its removal is crucial due to the fact that it decreases thermal conductivity and fluid flow rate.The chemical nature of the silicate scale depends on the chemistry of the water and theacceptable “industry standard” for dissolving silicates deposits is hydrofluoric acid often delivered by adding ammoniumbifluoride NH4·HF2 to a stronger acid solution.Although this approach iseffectiveit alsorequires meticulous attention to issues such as hazard potential (generation of HFin-situ) and acid-driven metallic corrosion (since cleanings must be done at lowpHs). Also calcium (which is present in most of the silicates) can decrease the efficiency of HF cleaning (HF spending). Fluoride ions attack calcium and produces insoluble toxic byproduct. Therefore safer more environmentally friendly ways to remove silicate deposits are desirable.Here we introduce a novel method for dissolving silicate scales and present a case study for its application in industry.
Key words: Silicate scale, hydrofluoric acid, corrosion, HF spending, industrial water systems, biodegradable polymers
This paper will focus on design parameters required for cathodic protection (CP) of stainless steel screens with particular attention on design and operational current density values and suitable protection criteria. The detrimental effects of overprotection will also be discussed.
We are unable to complete this action. Please try again at a later time.
If this error continues to occur, please contact AMPP Customer Support for assistance.
Error Message:
Please login to use Standards Credits*
* AMPP Members receive Standards Credits in order to redeem eligible Standards and Reports in the Store
You are not a Member.
AMPP Members enjoy many benefits, including Standards Credits which can be used to redeem eligible Standards and Reports in the Store.
You can visit the Membership Page to learn about the benefits of membership.
You have previously purchased this item.
Go to Downloadable Products in your AMPP Store profile to find this item.
You do not have sufficient Standards Credits to claim this item.
Click on 'ADD TO CART' to purchase this item.
Your Standards Credit(s)
1
Remaining Credits
0
Please review your transaction.
Click on 'REDEEM' to use your Standards Credits to claim this item.
You have successfully redeemed:
Go to Downloadable Products in your AMPP Store Profile to find and download this item.
An optical fiber corrosion sensor is developed to monitor the penetration of corrosion pits in steel bars. Simply made by encasing one end of an optical fiber into a steel straw. As corrosion penetrates the steel straw wall, the solution and corrosion products fill inside and contaminate the fiber end surface, resulting in a change in the reflectivity.
In this study, welding trials were performed on 22% Cr duplex stainless steel UNS S32205 corner joints with different wall thickness similar to the top plate and tubesheet plate joint configuration used in a fin fan cooler header box.