Alloy K-500 saw widespread use as a high strength material for sour service in the oil field
up to the mid-1980s. Its use declined after that, however, following field failures that were
published in the literature of wellhead stems, subsea bolts, and drill stem tools. These failures
appear to be unrelated to sour service. In the authors’ company, unpublicized failures of
downhole tools made from Alloy K-500 were observed in sour service, causing the company to
abandon Alloy K-500 for downhole tools in favor of other nickel alloys. As evidenced by the
ballot to the NACE/ISO Maintenance Panel to extend the performance limits of Alloy K-500 in
NACE MR0175 / ISO 15156-3A, it is obvious that there has been renewed interest by the
industry in Alloy K-500. This ballot was based upon laboratory testing, and two attempts at
passing the ballot failed. Committee discussion during the balloting suggested there was
insufficient detail in the past field experience to compare directly with the laboratory data, and
questions were also raised concerning the melt practice and metallurgical condition of the
material that had failed in the field. These issues prompted the authors to conduct a historical
review of their company’s past failures with the alloy. This paper will present three case
histories from the early 1980's where Alloy K-500 experienced failures in downhole equipment.
The intent of the paper is to put forward the field conditions under which the failures were seen
and report the analysis done on the failed components. This could help the reader better
understand the issues facing the use of Alloy K-500 alloy for downhole completion tools and
shed additional light on the Maintenance Panel’s decision to reject a ballot for extended limits
in NACE MR0175 / ISO 15156-3.