Menu
Search
Filters
Close
Menu

51317--9504-Validation of Corrosion Growth Rate Models

Picture for Validation of Corrosion Growth Rate Models
Available for download

Validation results of feature level and joint level CGR based on feature matching and signal matching. These results enable pipeline operators to establish defect repair schedules and re-inspection intervals with increased confidence.

Product Number: 51317--9504-SG
ISBN: 9504 2017 CP
Author: Yan Ping Li
Publication Date: 2017
Industry: Pipelines, Tanks, and Underground Systems
$0.00
$20.00
$20.00

Corrosion growth rate (CGR) is one of the key elements in corrosion threat management. It is used to determine metal loss In-Line Inspection (ILI) re-assessment interval flag the high growth features that requires excavation before the next ILI and predict probability of failure of an unmitigated feature. Over-estimated CGR may result in unnecessary expenditures for excavations and remediation while under-estimated CGR could result in pipeline failure. In this paper several CGR methodologies used by Enbridge to manage corrosion on pipelines including historical CGR back-to-back CGR and ILI signal based CGR are discussed and validated. Historical CGR refers to the rate that is calculated based on the ILI reported depth and vintage of the line. Back to back CGR refers to the rate that is calculated based on ILI reported depths of two back-to-back ILIs. Signal based CGR refers to the rate that is determined based on ILI raw data review provided from the ILI vendor. Both feature level and joint level CGR have been used in corrosion threat management. A probabilistic CGR methodology that accounts for uncertainty of measurement tools is also included in this study. This new CGR methodology includes calibrating ILI reported depth based on the ILI tool performance. ILI tool performance is evaluated using field data and considers ILI and field measurement errors. In this CGR model ILI reported depth is also adjusted based on static features which are those that are not growing such as mitigated features and manufacturing anomalies.The various CGR methodologies are validated based on comparing the predicted depth using CGR with ILI reported depth as well as field measurements. This paper demonstrates the validation results of historical back-to-back signal based CGR and the new CGR method. Recommendation of the CGR methodology is made based on the study. The CGR validation study enables pipeline operators to establish defect repair schedule and re-inspection intervals with increased confidence.

Key words: Corrosion growth rate, CGR, inline inspection, ILI, metal loss, validation, threat management, re-inspection interval

Corrosion growth rate (CGR) is one of the key elements in corrosion threat management. It is used to determine metal loss In-Line Inspection (ILI) re-assessment interval flag the high growth features that requires excavation before the next ILI and predict probability of failure of an unmitigated feature. Over-estimated CGR may result in unnecessary expenditures for excavations and remediation while under-estimated CGR could result in pipeline failure. In this paper several CGR methodologies used by Enbridge to manage corrosion on pipelines including historical CGR back-to-back CGR and ILI signal based CGR are discussed and validated. Historical CGR refers to the rate that is calculated based on the ILI reported depth and vintage of the line. Back to back CGR refers to the rate that is calculated based on ILI reported depths of two back-to-back ILIs. Signal based CGR refers to the rate that is determined based on ILI raw data review provided from the ILI vendor. Both feature level and joint level CGR have been used in corrosion threat management. A probabilistic CGR methodology that accounts for uncertainty of measurement tools is also included in this study. This new CGR methodology includes calibrating ILI reported depth based on the ILI tool performance. ILI tool performance is evaluated using field data and considers ILI and field measurement errors. In this CGR model ILI reported depth is also adjusted based on static features which are those that are not growing such as mitigated features and manufacturing anomalies.The various CGR methodologies are validated based on comparing the predicted depth using CGR with ILI reported depth as well as field measurements. This paper demonstrates the validation results of historical back-to-back signal based CGR and the new CGR method. Recommendation of the CGR methodology is made based on the study. The CGR validation study enables pipeline operators to establish defect repair schedule and re-inspection intervals with increased confidence.

Key words: Corrosion growth rate, CGR, inline inspection, ILI, metal loss, validation, threat management, re-inspection interval

Product tags
Also Purchased
Picture for Towards an Effective Corroded Pipelines Integrity Analysis
Available for download

51317--9510-Towards an Effective Corroded Pipelines Integrity Analysis

Product Number: 51317--9510-SG
ISBN: 9510 2017 CP
Author: Mona Abdolrazaghi
Publication Date: 2017
$20.00

The focus herein is on comparing integrity probabilistic analysis approaches with a brief discussion on the existing deterministic approaches. The comparison study utilizes real life application of In-Line-Inspection (ILI) and field measurements of corroded onshore pipelines.
Picture for Correlation of Inline and Aboveground Integrity Data for Comprehensive Pipeline Integrity Management
Available for download

51317--9648-Correlation of Inline and Aboveground Integrity Data for Comprehensive Pipeline Integrity Management

Product Number: 51317--9648-SG
ISBN: 9648 2017 CP
Author: Chukwuma Onuoha
Publication Date: 2017
$20.00

This paper provides comprehensive correlation of inline and aboveground pipeline integrity data geared at ensuring a complete pipeline integrity management program. Case studies are provided to show benefits of inline inspection and direct assessment correlations.

 
Picture for Use of Corrosion Rate Probes to Evaluate Pipeline Cathodic Protection Performance
Available for download

Use of Corrosion Rate Probes to Evaluate Pipeline Cathodic Protection Performance

Product Number: 51317--9180-SG
ISBN: 9180 2017 CP
Author: Vera Kustova
Publication Date: 2017
$20.00

A natural gas transmission pipeline is routed through South Texas where cathodic protection levels can vary significantly throughout the year.  This paper discusses the use of precision electrical resistance type corrosion rate probes and remote monitoring of the probe corrosion rate.
Categories
Industry
Recently viewed
Popular tags
View all

Association for Materials Protection and Performance

© AMPP All Rights Reserved.
Membership Terms of Content Use
Contact Customer Support