Server maintenance is scheduled for Saturday, December 21st between 6am-10am CST.

During that time, parts of our website will be affected until maintenance is completed. Thank you for your patience.

Menu
Search
Filters
Close
Menu

51315-5858-Uncertainty Assessment in DCB Testing

Picture for Uncertainty Assessment in DCB Testing
Available for download
Product Number: 51315-5858-SG
ISBN: 5858 2015 CP
Author: Sebastian Cravero
Publication Date: 2015
$0.00
$20.00
$20.00
Method D Double cantilever beam (DCB) test is used for design/fitness-for-service material qualification and specification purposes. Material resistance to propagation of environmental cracks is expressed in terms of a critical stress intensity factor KISSC or K-limit values. Usually these values are used without considering the experimental uncertainties and material variability i.e. error estimation environmental conditions etc.However when comparing the sulfide stress corrosion cracking (SSC) performance of different materials the quantification of experimental uncertainties becomes of fundamental importance. To rank materials according to their fracture toughness attention should be paid to the error bracket associated with each value.In this work two methods for determining the uncertainties associated with NACE TM0177 Method D are presented. The first one consists in the estimation of the experimental uncertainties in measured parameters and the Monte Carlo method is used to obtain the uncertainty in Klimit. The second method treats the experimental data as sets that have an intrinsic variability (i.e.: variability of the medium material etc.) and the Monte Carlo method is used to obtain the uncertainty in Klimit.
Method D Double cantilever beam (DCB) test is used for design/fitness-for-service material qualification and specification purposes. Material resistance to propagation of environmental cracks is expressed in terms of a critical stress intensity factor KISSC or K-limit values. Usually these values are used without considering the experimental uncertainties and material variability i.e. error estimation environmental conditions etc.However when comparing the sulfide stress corrosion cracking (SSC) performance of different materials the quantification of experimental uncertainties becomes of fundamental importance. To rank materials according to their fracture toughness attention should be paid to the error bracket associated with each value.In this work two methods for determining the uncertainties associated with NACE TM0177 Method D are presented. The first one consists in the estimation of the experimental uncertainties in measured parameters and the Monte Carlo method is used to obtain the uncertainty in Klimit. The second method treats the experimental data as sets that have an intrinsic variability (i.e.: variability of the medium material etc.) and the Monte Carlo method is used to obtain the uncertainty in Klimit.
Also Purchased
Picture for 06126 UNDERSTANDING AND CONTROLLING VARIATIONS
Available for download

06126 UNDERSTANDING AND CONTROLLING VARIATIONS IN DCB TEST RESULTS

Product Number: 51300-06126-SG
ISBN: 06126 2006 CP
Author: P. Sutter, J. Leyer, H. Marchebois, C. Bosch, E. Wanzenberg, A. Kulgemeyer, B.J. Orlans-Joliet
$20.00
Picture for 97052 SULFIDE STRESS CRACKING: SOME
Available for download

97052 SULFIDE STRESS CRACKING: SOME OSBERVATIONS ABOUT THE DCB TEST

Product Number: 51300-97052-SG
ISBN: 97052 1997 CP
Author: C.R. Morales, T.E. Perez, G.L. Fitzsimons
$20.00
Picture for 99606 DCB Test : a Review of Critical Parameters
Available for download

99606 DCB Test : a Review of Critical Parameters

Product Number: 51300-99606-SG
ISBN: 99606 1999 CP
Author: G.C. GUNTZ, C.P. UNNE, F. PUISSOCHET, B..l. ORLANS-JOLIET, R.K. POEPPERLING, J.M. FLIETHMANN
$20.00
Categories
Industry
Recently viewed
Popular tags
View all

Association for Materials Protection and Performance

© AMPP All Rights Reserved.
Membership Terms of Content Use
Contact Customer Support