Celebrate World Corrosion Awareness Day with 20% off eCourses and eBooks with code WCAD2024 at checkout!
Aluminum (Al) alloys are the most common non-ferrous metals used (approximately 25 million tons per year) and the second most commonly used metal alloy after steel1. Some of the properties of Al alloys that attribute to their worldwide use include lightness, thermal conductivity, electrical conductivity, suitability for surface treatments, and corrosion resistance. Al alloys are also combined with other metals/materials to achieve desired properties for specific applications. Al alloys can be joined to other materials with ease to enhance their combined properties with the following techniques: welding, bolting, riveting, clinching, adhesive bonding, and brazing1.
Aluminum (Al) alloys are the most commonly used non-ferrous metals (approximately 25 million tons per year) for various technical applications and the second most commonly used metal alloy after steel. Al alloys are also combined with other metals/materials to get specific desirable properties for particular applications. However, a system of dissimilar materials can lead to potential corrosion problems such as galvanic and/or crevice corrosion. In this work, atmospheric galvanic corrosion of aluminum (Al) alloy was predicted by combining electrochemical techniques and accelerated laboratory corrosion tests. Three different galvanic couples were analyzed where 6061-T6 Al alloy (UNS A96061) was coupled with a passivating metal (304 stainless steel or UNS S30400), noble metal (copper or UNS C11000) and a conductive polymer matrix composite (PMC) reinforced with carbon fiber. The galvanic current flowing between the anode and cathode was measured using the zero-resistance ammeter (ZRA) technique in the humidity-chamber setup. Electrolytes with varying amounts of chloride contents were used to imitate different atmospheric conditions. An equation based on Faraday’s law was developed to calculate the corrosion rate in grams per meter square per day (gmd) by relating the time of wetness (TOW) from the field exposure to the galvanic current measured from the accelerated laboratory experiments. The total exposure time was divided into wet periods (Twet) and dry periods (Tdry). Cyclic corrosion test chamber following a modified GM9540P cycle and outdoor exposure experiments are planned for the future.
Various austenitic stainless steels such as UNS S30409, S31609, S32109 and 34709 are widely used in complex refinery or chemical plants at temperature ranges between 550°C and 950°C. However, Stress Relaxation Cracking (SRC) in welded joints or cold deformed parts has been a serious problem during fabrication or operation. Several researches were conducted to construct SRC test methods. This included the evaluation of SRC susceptibilities among various austenitic stainless steels and to determine SRC mechanism within TNO Science and Industry or JIP1-4. It was concluded that SRC was caused by the accommodation of strain due to both carbide/nitride precipitation hardening inhibiting dislocation movement and the formation of precipitation free zone along the M23C6 carbide at grain boundary during stress relaxation process of welding residual stresses at temperatures between 550°C and 750°C.
We are unable to complete this action. Please try again at a later time.
If this error continues to occur, please contact AMPP Customer Support for assistance.
Use this error code for reference:
Please login to use Standards Credits*
* AMPP Members receive Standards Credits in order to redeem eligible Standards and Reports in the Store
You are not a Member.
AMPP Members enjoy many benefits, including Standards Credits which can be used to redeem eligible Standards and Reports in the Store.
You can visit the Membership Page to learn about the benefits of membership.
You have previously purchased this item.
Go to Downloadable Products in your AMPP Store profile to find this item.
You do not have sufficient Standards Credits to claim this item.
Click on 'ADD TO CART' to purchase this item.
Your Standards Credit(s)
1
Remaining Credits
0
Please review your transaction.
Click on 'REDEEM' to use your Standards Credits to claim this item.
You have successfully redeemed:
Go to Downloadable Products in your AMPP Store Profile to find and download this item.
Industrial usage of Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation (PEO) has grown consistently in recent years, thanks to the improved characteristics imparted to the oxide film in terms of surface adhesion, hardness, crystallinity, uniformity, and corrosion resistance. The metallic substrate is not subjected to elevated temperature and the overall equipment complexity is relatively simple, making the technique a good candidate for surface functionalization. In PEO treatments, high voltages are employed (~ 150-750 V 1) allowing for the formation of an insulating, or at least semiconductive, oxide layer that’s limits ion transport responsible for the initial coating growth. Beyond the spark voltage (prerequisite the enter the PEO regime) oxidation does not occur only as the result of a continuous flow of ions but rather it takes place after the cooling of a plasma discharge.
Traditional solutions for the chemical passivation of stainless steel are nitric acid based, with the addition of sodium dichromate as an inhibitor for precipitation hardened and free machining stainless steels. These passivation chemistries are difficult to handle from an environmental health and safety point of view, particularly the dichromate inhibited versions. Citric acid passivation has been pursued as a replacement for both nitric acid and inhibited nitric acid based chemistries for many years, and has been incorporated into consensus specifications such as ASTM A967 and SAE AMS2700.