Server maintenance is scheduled for Saturday, December 21st between 6am-10am CST.

During that time, parts of our website will be affected until maintenance is completed. Thank you for your patience.

Menu
Search
Filters
Close
Menu

Opportunistic Compilation Of ECDA, ILI, And Hydrostatic Testing For Successful Pipeline Uprating: Case Study

Picture for Opportunistic Compilation Of ECDA, ILI, And Hydrostatic Testing For Successful Pipeline Uprating: Case Study
Available for download

The annual natural gas demand in the United States surpassed 31 trillion cubic feet in 2019. This is over a 500% increase from demand in the 1950’s (5.7 trillion cubic feet) [1]. As gas demand continues to rise, pipeline operators have limited options to meet demand requirements. Pressure uprating is one option that can be leveraged for certain pipelines to meet the increased demand economically.

Product Number: 51322-17480-SG
Author: Paul S. Young
Publication Date: 2022
Industries: Pipelines, Tanks, and Underground Systems , Coatings and Linings , Coatings
$0.00
$20.00
$20.00

Regulators require minimum federal safety standards for pressure uprating as described in 49 CFR Part 192 Subpart K. Pipeline uprating to a pressure that will produce a hoop stress of 30% or more of SMYS in steel pipelines require a series of documented integrity assessments to ensure the pressure uprating will not adversely affect the safe operation. The objective of this paper is to disseminate a process that operators can use to develop an effective integrity assessment guide for pressure uprating. This guide exceeds the requirements established in §192.555. The combination of External Corrosion Direct Assessment (ECDA), In-Line Inspection (ILI), and hydrostatic testing is used in conjunction to identify a variety of time dependent and time independent threats. A systematic approach for chronological implementation of assessment types for pressure uprating has been validated through a successful case study.

Regulators require minimum federal safety standards for pressure uprating as described in 49 CFR Part 192 Subpart K. Pipeline uprating to a pressure that will produce a hoop stress of 30% or more of SMYS in steel pipelines require a series of documented integrity assessments to ensure the pressure uprating will not adversely affect the safe operation. The objective of this paper is to disseminate a process that operators can use to develop an effective integrity assessment guide for pressure uprating. This guide exceeds the requirements established in §192.555. The combination of External Corrosion Direct Assessment (ECDA), In-Line Inspection (ILI), and hydrostatic testing is used in conjunction to identify a variety of time dependent and time independent threats. A systematic approach for chronological implementation of assessment types for pressure uprating has been validated through a successful case study.

Product tags
Also Purchased
Picture for AC Interference and Mitigation: Heartland Case Study
Available for download

AC Interference and Mitigation: Heartland Case Study

Product Number: 51317--9461-SG
ISBN: 9461 2017 CP
Author: Matthew Lechelt
Publication Date: 2017
$20.00

Challenges associated with coordinating the modelling, design, and installation of an alternating current interference and mitigation systems. The project consisted of a 65 kilometer long double circuit 500 kilovolt (kV) overhead transmission in a heavily congested right-of-way corridor with more than 80 pipelines.
Picture for Case Study: Foreign Operator DC Interference On An Existing Pipeline Systems
Available for download

Case Study: Foreign Operator DC Interference On An Existing Pipeline Systems

Product Number: 51322-17587-SG
Author: Jessica Jaskolka
Publication Date: 2022
$20.00

EN Engineering (ENE) completed an AC interference study over 68 miles of an operator’s transmission line. In addition, an ACVG survey of approximately one (1) mile of the pipeline was conducted at the take-off point of the 8” line. As a result of this AC interference study, evidence of elevated AC corrosion risk has not been found on the operator’s pipeline. However, a review of the provided data shows evidence of DC interference due to a nearby foreign rectifier groundbed at the take-off point of the operator’s line.
Picture for Case Study - Sharing An AC Mitigation System
Available for download

Case Study - Sharing An AC Mitigation System

Product Number: 51322-17786-SG
Author: Hycem Bahgat
Publication Date: 2022
$20.00

AC interference analysis between high voltage AC (HVAC) powerlines and buried pipelines is a matter of current interest due to the growing number of right-of-ways shared between powerline and pipeline infrastructure. This is only expected to increase as the worldwide energy demand grows considerably over the next 30 years,1 and stricter environmental regulations and policies are applied. Therefore, AC interference will continue to be an issue of concern for powerline and pipeline operators to protect the public, environment, and maintain asset integrity.
Categories
Industry
Recently viewed
Popular tags
View all

Association for Materials Protection and Performance

© AMPP All Rights Reserved.
Membership Terms of Content Use
Contact Customer Support