Search
Filters
Close

Celebrate World Corrosion Awareness Day with 20% off eCourses and eBooks with code WCAD2024 at checkout!

51313-02258-Offshore Pipeline Coating for Field Joints—Why??

Product Number: 51313-02258-SG
ISBN: 02258 2013 CP
Author: Michael Surkein
Publication Date: 2013
$0.00
$20.00
$20.00

Offshore steel pipelines are typically shop coated with a robust anticorrosive coating such as fusion bonded epoxy or a multilayer polyolefin system. Cathodic protection in the form of sacrificial anodes is also normally installed to help provide corrosion control. Since these offshore pipelines are welded together in either single of double joint segments on the offshore lay vessel; there is a need to apply a coating at the weld locations. These coatings are commonly called field joint coatings. The typical field joint coatings used for offshore pipelines include liquid applied materials such as epoxies urethanes epoxy/urethanes heat shrinkable sleeves or sometimes fusion bonded epoxy among other materials.
During the installation of an offshore pipeline the application of the field joint coating is often described as a time consuming step. The time to properly apply a field joint coating can range up to 15 to 20 minutes. Although this doesn’t seem long per joint; however considering that a deep water pipeline could have hundreds or even thousands of joints the field joint coating installation time can be quite large. As the typical pipeline lay vessel day rate can evolve into the hundreds of thousands of dollars there can be a significant economic incentive to eliminate the offshore pipeline field joint. Of course any reduction in the corrosion integrity of the pipeline is not acceptable. The same issue often arises for tie-in weld joints. Can the tie-in joint be left bare or does it need to be coated is a commonly asked question? As with the other field joints there can be a significant time savings by not applying a coating to the tie-in joint. A major issue with potentially eliminating the field joint coatings is the need to upgrade the pipeline’s cathodic protection system to account for the additional bare steel (uncoated) surface area. This paper will highlight from a conceptual standpoint advantages and disadvantages with eliminating the field joint coating for the main pipeline and tie-in joints. The implications for the cathodic protection system will also be covered. The intent of this paper is to challenge the typical practice of coatings all field joints and to initiate a dialogue among the industry corrosion and pipeline engineers.
 

Offshore steel pipelines are typically shop coated with a robust anticorrosive coating such as fusion bonded epoxy or a multilayer polyolefin system. Cathodic protection in the form of sacrificial anodes is also normally installed to help provide corrosion control. Since these offshore pipelines are welded together in either single of double joint segments on the offshore lay vessel; there is a need to apply a coating at the weld locations. These coatings are commonly called field joint coatings. The typical field joint coatings used for offshore pipelines include liquid applied materials such as epoxies urethanes epoxy/urethanes heat shrinkable sleeves or sometimes fusion bonded epoxy among other materials.
During the installation of an offshore pipeline the application of the field joint coating is often described as a time consuming step. The time to properly apply a field joint coating can range up to 15 to 20 minutes. Although this doesn’t seem long per joint; however considering that a deep water pipeline could have hundreds or even thousands of joints the field joint coating installation time can be quite large. As the typical pipeline lay vessel day rate can evolve into the hundreds of thousands of dollars there can be a significant economic incentive to eliminate the offshore pipeline field joint. Of course any reduction in the corrosion integrity of the pipeline is not acceptable. The same issue often arises for tie-in weld joints. Can the tie-in joint be left bare or does it need to be coated is a commonly asked question? As with the other field joints there can be a significant time savings by not applying a coating to the tie-in joint. A major issue with potentially eliminating the field joint coatings is the need to upgrade the pipeline’s cathodic protection system to account for the additional bare steel (uncoated) surface area. This paper will highlight from a conceptual standpoint advantages and disadvantages with eliminating the field joint coating for the main pipeline and tie-in joints. The implications for the cathodic protection system will also be covered. The intent of this paper is to challenge the typical practice of coatings all field joints and to initiate a dialogue among the industry corrosion and pipeline engineers.
 

Product tags
Also Purchased
Picture for 10010 A New 3LPP Offshore Field Joint Coating
Available for download

10010 A New 3LPP Offshore Field Joint Coating

Product Number: 51300-10010-SG
ISBN: 10010 2010 CP
Author: Meghan Mallozzi and Mario Perez
Publication Date: 2010
$20.00
Picture for 04020 Innovations in Field Joint Coatings to
Available for download

04020 Innovations in Field Joint Coatings to Meet Rigorous Specifications for Offshore Pipelines

Product Number: 51300-04020-SG
ISBN: 04020 2004 CP
Author: Bob Buchanan, Emerson Tacoma, and Dilip Tailor, Canusa CPS
$20.00
Picture for Dealing with Severe Corrosion on a Recently Installed Pipeline
Available for download

51313-02253-Dealing with Severe Corrosion on a Recently Installed Pipeline

Product Number: 51313-02253-SG
ISBN: 02253 2013 CP
Author: Sorin Segall
Publication Date: 2013
$20.00