Menu
Search
Filters
Close
Menu

Save 20% on select titles with code HIDDEN24 - Shop The Sale Now

51312-01163-Evaluation of Global Cathodic Protection Criteria - Part 1: Criteria and Relevance with Cathodic Pro

Picture for Evaluation of Global Cathodic Protection Criteria - Part 1: Criteria and Relevance with Cathodic Pro
Available for download
Product Number: 51312-01163-SG
ISBN: 01163 2012 CP
Author: Fengmei Song
Publication Date: 2012
$0.00
$20.00
$20.00
Cathodic potential (CP) criteria have been used as a recommended minimum requirement for controlling external corrosion of buried or submerged steel piping systems. A critical review of CP criteria in five international CP standards and historical publications was undertaken. Discrepant and sometimes conflicting CP criteria were found among the CP standards. This may confuse practitioners and lead to misdirected decisions. The impact on the operating cost can also be significant when an inappropriate criterion is used such as the ?850 mV on- vs. off-potential criterion in areas with current interferences. This discrepancy associated with diverse and sometimes conflicting CP criteria may be attributed to both the lack of sufficient field data for validating the criteria and the lack of clarity with the fundamentals behind the criteria. In the first part of a three-part paper the historical versions of the CP criteria in NACE Standard RP/SP 0169 were reviewed the criteria in five international CP standards were compared and an understanding of the correlation between CP criteria and theory was provided.
Cathodic potential (CP) criteria have been used as a recommended minimum requirement for controlling external corrosion of buried or submerged steel piping systems. A critical review of CP criteria in five international CP standards and historical publications was undertaken. Discrepant and sometimes conflicting CP criteria were found among the CP standards. This may confuse practitioners and lead to misdirected decisions. The impact on the operating cost can also be significant when an inappropriate criterion is used such as the ?850 mV on- vs. off-potential criterion in areas with current interferences. This discrepancy associated with diverse and sometimes conflicting CP criteria may be attributed to both the lack of sufficient field data for validating the criteria and the lack of clarity with the fundamentals behind the criteria. In the first part of a three-part paper the historical versions of the CP criteria in NACE Standard RP/SP 0169 were reviewed the criteria in five international CP standards were compared and an understanding of the correlation between CP criteria and theory was provided.
Product tags
Also Purchased
Picture for Evaluation of Global Cathodic Protection Criteria – Part 2: Effectiveness of the -850 mV On- and Off
Available for download

51312-01164-Evaluation of Global Cathodic Protection Criteria – Part 2: Effectiveness of the -850 mV On- and Off

Product Number: 51312-01164-SG
ISBN: 01164 2012 CP
Author: Fengmei Song
Publication Date: 2012
$20.00
Picture for Evaluation of Global Cathodic Protection Criteria - Part 3: Effectiveness of the 100 mV Polarization
Available for download

51312-01165-Evaluation of Global Cathodic Protection Criteria - Part 3: Effectiveness of the 100 mV Polarization

Product Number: 51312-01165-
ISBN: 01165 2012 CP
Author: Fengmei Song
Publication Date: 2012
$20.00
Picture for Cathodic Protection Criteria in The Presence of AC Interference
Available for download

51315-5753-Cathodic Protection Criteria in The Presence of AC Interference

Product Number: 51315-5753-SG
ISBN: 5753 2015 CP
Author: Andrea Brenna
Publication Date: 2015
$0.00
Categories
Industry
Recently viewed
Popular tags
View all

Association for Materials Protection and Performance

© AMPP All Rights Reserved.
Membership Terms of Content Use
Contact Customer Support