Menu
Search
Filters
Close
Menu

Save 20% on select titles with code HIDDEN24 - Shop The Sale Now

15.5-Year Inspection Reveals the Effectiveness of a Single-Coat Epoxy

15-Year Inspections Reveals the Effectiveness of Single-Coat Epoxy Coating System
Available for download

In the mid-1990s, the US Navy’s technical community, led by Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA), recognized existing coatings used to protect the inside of ships’ tanks were failing on average 5-8 years after application. The high cost to blast and recoat over 11,000 tanks every 5-8 years, not counting submarines and aircraft carriers, was prohibitive. To address this issue, the Navy conducted a study to analyze the problem and decided to replace these legacy coatings with high solid epoxy coatings.1

Product Number: 51322-17996-SG
Author: Guy Zanti
Publication Date: 2022
Industries: Military , Maritime , Pipelines, Tanks, and Underground Systems , Coatings
$0.00
$20.00
$20.00

In 2000, the US Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) for Corrosion Science & Engineering began work on the Future Naval Capabilities’ Single Coat Program. The program aimed to reduce corrosion damage and maintenance time by replacing legacy, solvent-based coatings with high solids, single coat, rapid cure, MIL-PRF-23236D Type VII high solids epoxy coatings to the fleet.

In 2005, a US Navy ship’s seawater ballast tank coating had failed and needed replacement. The failed coating (applied in 1996) was replaced by a 100% solids epoxy coating system and the ship was returned to service. Follow-up inspections on the coating’s performance were conducted 15 months, 7.5 years, and 15.5 years after the lining was applied.

The 100% solids, single coat epoxy coatings system demonstrated that it was meeting the Navy’s goals of minimizing failures and reducing maintenance costs.

In 2000, the US Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) for Corrosion Science & Engineering began work on the Future Naval Capabilities’ Single Coat Program. The program aimed to reduce corrosion damage and maintenance time by replacing legacy, solvent-based coatings with high solids, single coat, rapid cure, MIL-PRF-23236D Type VII high solids epoxy coatings to the fleet.

In 2005, a US Navy ship’s seawater ballast tank coating had failed and needed replacement. The failed coating (applied in 1996) was replaced by a 100% solids epoxy coating system and the ship was returned to service. Follow-up inspections on the coating’s performance were conducted 15 months, 7.5 years, and 15.5 years after the lining was applied.

The 100% solids, single coat epoxy coatings system demonstrated that it was meeting the Navy’s goals of minimizing failures and reducing maintenance costs.

Product tags
Also Purchased
Picture for Coatings + Proceedings 2021-ALL Papers
Available for download

(Inspection) What Do You Really Need to Know to be a Good Coatings Inspector?

Product Number: 60-COAT_DEC21
Author: William D. Corbett
Publication Date: 2021
$20.00

The role of a Coating Inspector has evolved considerably over the past few decades, and the responsibilities have increased over what used to be a rather straightforward job: to verify that surface preparation and coating application meet the project specification requirements. Today there are week-long or multi-week basic and advanced coating inspection courses, specialty courses that are industry-specific (e.g., bridge, nuclear), courses that are substrate-specific (e.g., concrete coatings inspection) and even coating-specific (e.g., inspection of thermal spray coatings). 
Picture for Coatings + Proceedings 2021-ALL Papers
Available for download

(Surface Prep) Don’t Let Your Eyes Deceive You

Product Number: 67-COAT_DEC21
Author: Kenneth E. Rossy / Alexander J. Petkas,
Publication Date: 2021
$20.00

A steel surface has been properly prepared to a white metal blast and it looks great … to the naked eye at least. But is it? Why is a surface that has the correct profile and appears to be perfectly clean typically not good enough? A standard abrasive blast will give you the profile and visible cleanliness, but how clean is it? Testing is the only way to determine. That is testing for conductivity, chlorides, and any other contaminants.
Dollars & Cents - You Make the Choice: A Look at Elastomer Polyurethane Versus Epoxy Laminate Lining Systems for The Linings of Water or Wastewater Structures
Available for download

“Dollars & Cents - You Make The Choice: A Look At Elastomer Polyurethane Versus Epoxy Laminate Lining Systems For The Linings Of Water Or Wastewater Structures”

Product Number: 51322-18202-SG
Author: Greg Hansen
Publication Date: 2022
$20.00

Asset owners spend significant monies each year on the construction of new and the maintenance of existing infrastructure.  More than ever, these funds can be difficult to procure and budget. The owners include, both municipal and industrial entities and funds are limited in most cases, therefore, asset service life is very important to all parties. 
Categories
Industry
Recently viewed
Popular tags
View all

Association for Materials Protection and Performance

© AMPP All Rights Reserved.
Membership Terms of Content Use
Contact Customer Support