Server maintenance is scheduled for Saturday, December 21st between 6am-10am CST.
During that time, parts of our website will be affected until maintenance is completed. Thank you for your patience.
Use GIVING24 at checkout to save 20% on eCourses and books (some exclusions apply)!
Outdoor tests and accelerated weathering experiments have been carried out to confirm the weathering performance of coating systems with ambient cure fluoro-polymer topcoats. The results showed that the protective performance of such coating systems was superior to other topcoats such as polyurethane coating.
Coating systems with ambient cure fluoro-polymer topcoats were developed in 1982 and have been applied to numerous steel structures since then. They have been demonstrated to give the best weathering performance among other commonly used topcoats. To confirm this, outdoor tests and accelerated weathering tests have been carried out. Gloss retention during exposure was measured, the surface appearance of each sample observed by SEM, and surface degradation analyzed by FT-IR spectroscopy. In addition, the extent of coating degradation by chalking was measured. It was observed that chalking of fluoro-polymer was much lower compared with that of coating systems such as polyurethanes, which means the fluoro-polymer coating retains its initial coating film thickness. Fluoro-polymer coatings have been applied to many steel and concrete structures, for example to high rise buildings and bridges where it is not easy to do maintenance. The results showed that the protective performance of the fluoro-polymer coating system was superior to other topcoats such as the polyurethane coating. Track records of fluoro-polymer topcoats were also studied and compared with laboratory testing. Key words: Weather-ability, Protective performance, Fluoro-polymer coating Surface observations, maintenance, Life cycle cost
This paper discusses a classic example where the facts surrounding the failure of a lining system were ignored and undue reliance was placed on laboratory analysis. This “blind faith” in analytical data without a sound causal theory caused the failure analysts to disregard or overlook the obvious.
We are unable to complete this action. Please try again at a later time.
If this error continues to occur, please contact AMPP Customer Support for assistance.
Error Message:
Please login to use Standards Credits*
* AMPP Members receive Standards Credits in order to redeem eligible Standards and Reports in the Store
You are not a Member.
AMPP Members enjoy many benefits, including Standards Credits which can be used to redeem eligible Standards and Reports in the Store.
You can visit the Membership Page to learn about the benefits of membership.
You have previously purchased this item.
Go to Downloadable Products in your AMPP Store profile to find this item.
You do not have sufficient Standards Credits to claim this item.
Click on 'ADD TO CART' to purchase this item.
Your Standards Credit(s)
1
Remaining Credits
0
Please review your transaction.
Click on 'REDEEM' to use your Standards Credits to claim this item.
You have successfully redeemed:
Go to Downloadable Products in your AMPP Store Profile to find and download this item.
In this paper the approach of an Oil Company is demonstrated from the initial choice between different primers: inorganic zinc and organic (epoxy) zinc., to all the preliminary pre-qualification tests, the subsequently field test performed, and the procedures adopted, costs included.
Modern high performance paint systems are so durable that when exposed to natural weathering they may show only slight signs of deterioration. This means that new coatings being marketed have limited track records. Which creates an increased reliance on accelerated laboratory testing to evaluate performance.