During hydrotesting, a pipeline may be shut-in for a significant period of time. If unprotected,
the pipeline becomes susceptible to corrosion due to bacteria, oxygen, and saline conditions of
the hydrotest water, typically obtained from surface waters and seawater. Most notably,
indigenous bacterial populations in source water used to fill the pipeline can proliferate in the
stagnant shut-in condition and attach to the pipe wall forming biofilms. These sessile biofilms
may contain sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB) and/or acid-producing bacteria (APB) which can
contribute to microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC). In addition, SRB generate hydrogen
sulfide (H2S) which is hazardous, corrosive, and can form iron sulfide solids. To protect
against these adverse effects, three types of chemicals are generally recommended to be
added to the hydrotest water during the pipeline fill: an oxygen scavenger, a biocide, and a
corrosion inhibitor.
Chemical treatment to prevent corrosion invariably deals with balancing risk, damage to the
environment, and cost of the program. The method of applying chemical is important to ensure
protection for extended shut-in times. Monitoring is important to ensure that protection is being
provided during shut-in and that risk is minimized after the pipeline is brought into operation.
The paper will discuss different methods for discharging the water into the environment as well
as procedures to ensure corrosion protection for shut-in times that exceed the original target
discharge date.
Keywords: hydrotest, microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC), biocide, sulfate-reducing
bacteria (SRB), acid-producing bacteria (SRB), monitoring