Server maintenance is scheduled for Saturday, December 21st between 6am-10am CST.

During that time, parts of our website will be affected until maintenance is completed. Thank you for your patience.

Menu
Search
Filters
Close
Menu

10190 Corrosion Management in a Safety Case Regulatory Regime

Picture for 10190 Corrosion Management in a Safety Case Regulatory Regime
Available for download
Product Number: 51300-10190-SG
ISBN: 10190 2010 CP
Author: Peter T. Wilson and Oliver Susic
Publication Date: 2010
$0.00
$20.00
$20.00
Oil and gas plants in Victoria, Australia are subject to the Major Hazards Facilities Regulations administered by Victorian Work Cover Authority. A requirement of those regulations is the preparation of a safety case which documents a safety management system. There are no explicit regulatory requirements under the MHF regulations for asset integrity. However included in the regulations are requirements such as “the operator of a MHF must adopt control measures which eliminate or if it is not practical to eliminate, which reduce so far as is practicable, risk to health and safety”. The regulations provide for a goal-setting performance based regime under which the operator defines appropriate controls for safe operation, evaluates their adequacy for the facility and decides how to implement and maintain these controls in practice. This paper discusses an evidence based approach to corrosion management which “reduce risk to health and safety so far as is practicable” for a gas processing and liquids recovery plant including an offshore platform. The examples of modes of corrosion damage which require adequate “control measures” include CO2 corrosion, SCC of stainless steel in a severe marine environment and liquid metal embrittlement of aluminum alloys. The evidence is based on knowing the possible damage mechanisms and their dependence on process parameters. The “control measures” include appropriate alloy selection and fabrication to recognized standards, control and monitoring of key integrity determining parameters to confirm operation is within the design envelope and inspection where needed to confirm rates of damage accumulation.

Keywords: corrosion, process engineering, gas, liquids processing, risk, control measures
Oil and gas plants in Victoria, Australia are subject to the Major Hazards Facilities Regulations administered by Victorian Work Cover Authority. A requirement of those regulations is the preparation of a safety case which documents a safety management system. There are no explicit regulatory requirements under the MHF regulations for asset integrity. However included in the regulations are requirements such as “the operator of a MHF must adopt control measures which eliminate or if it is not practical to eliminate, which reduce so far as is practicable, risk to health and safety”. The regulations provide for a goal-setting performance based regime under which the operator defines appropriate controls for safe operation, evaluates their adequacy for the facility and decides how to implement and maintain these controls in practice. This paper discusses an evidence based approach to corrosion management which “reduce risk to health and safety so far as is practicable” for a gas processing and liquids recovery plant including an offshore platform. The examples of modes of corrosion damage which require adequate “control measures” include CO2 corrosion, SCC of stainless steel in a severe marine environment and liquid metal embrittlement of aluminum alloys. The evidence is based on knowing the possible damage mechanisms and their dependence on process parameters. The “control measures” include appropriate alloy selection and fabrication to recognized standards, control and monitoring of key integrity determining parameters to confirm operation is within the design envelope and inspection where needed to confirm rates of damage accumulation.

Keywords: corrosion, process engineering, gas, liquids processing, risk, control measures
Product tags
Also Purchased
Picture for Corrosion Management Implementation in Large Oil and Gas Projects
Available for download

51316-7255-Corrosion Management Implementation in Large Oil and Gas Projects

Product Number: 51316-7255-SG
ISBN: 7255 2016 CP
Author: Hendrik Debruyn
Publication Date: 2016
$20.00

The corrosion management (CM) process could mitigate asset corrosion issues, post-commissioning. Prerequisites are necessary. • Human resources competency •Teamwork and managerial support. This paper looks into how the aforementioned parameters could influence CM implementation and how the whole process could be further improved.
Picture for Pipeline Corrosion Management; a Compendium
Available for download

51314-3723-Pipeline Corrosion Management; a Compendium

Product Number: 51314-3723-SG
ISBN: 3723 2014 CP
Author: Bijan Kermani
Publication Date: 2014
$0.00

This paper summarizes major elements of a recent recommended practice (RP) on Pipeline Corrosion Management (PCM) published by the European Federation of Corrosion (EFC). The RP goes into details on a methodical approach to carrying out PCM.
Picture for Aim Corrosion Management: Perfect Key Performance Indicators
Available for download

Aim Corrosion Management: Perfect Key Performance Indicators

Product Number: 51317--8823-SG
ISBN: 8823 2017 CP
Author: Sankara Papavinasam
Publication Date: 2017
$20.00

This paper illustrates fifty (50) Key Perfomance Indicators (KPIs) that were developed based on industry surveys and failure analysis; application of these 50 KPIs using 10 case studies and explains cost effectiveness of various KPIs.
Categories
Industry
Recently viewed
Popular tags
View all

Association for Materials Protection and Performance

© AMPP All Rights Reserved.
Membership Terms of Content Use
Contact Customer Support