Save 20% on select best sellers with code MONSTER24 - Shop The Sale Now
This paper summarizes major elements of a recent recommended practice (RP) on Pipeline Corrosion Management (PCM) published by the European Federation of Corrosion (EFC). The RP goes into details on a methodical approach to carrying out PCM.
We are unable to complete this action. Please try again at a later time.
If this error continues to occur, please contact AMPP Customer Support for assistance.
Error Message:
Please login to use Standards Credits*
* AMPP Members receive Standards Credits in order to redeem eligible Standards and Reports in the Store
You are not a Member.
AMPP Members enjoy many benefits, including Standards Credits which can be used to redeem eligible Standards and Reports in the Store.
You can visit the Membership Page to learn about the benefits of membership.
You have previously purchased this item.
Go to Downloadable Products in your AMPP Store profile to find this item.
You do not have sufficient Standards Credits to claim this item.
Click on 'ADD TO CART' to purchase this item.
Your Standards Credit(s)
1
Remaining Credits
0
Please review your transaction.
Click on 'REDEEM' to use your Standards Credits to claim this item.
You have successfully redeemed:
Go to Downloadable Products in your AMPP Store Profile to find and download this item.
The Brazilian cost of corrosion was estimated at 3% of the GPD in 2018, that percentage is equivalent to approximately $US 49 billion, according to an ABRACO(1) journal released in 2020.1 It is estimated that from this cost $US 19 billion could have been saved through anticorrosive actions. In another research conducted by the EPRI(2) the results showed that at least 22% of corrosion costs could be avoided through adequate mitigating actions.2
The best Clients know what they want and provide Contractors with clear guidelines or specifications. Then the Contractor knows what is required however disconnect often occurs between management and field staff when meeting the specification objectives. Management want to impress the Client and submit detailed quality report forms which need to be completed by field staff however often the forms supplied are not aligned to the daily activities and are seen as not being relevant to the field staff.
Business planning is often an overlooked management tool. Developing a business planning mindset to manage people and to tackle challenges is often the only difference between successful companies and ones that struggle with the same issues year-after-year. This seminar will give you tools to set the plan into motion.
A discussion on the issues and challenges related to surface preparation in the field. As means and methods diversify and structure types become more complex, challenges arise. This presentation attempts to identify some of the potential issues and challenges associated with today’s modern methods of surface preparation in the field.
Construction labor experts are becoming overwhelmingly concerned that we will not have the workforce to maintain, let alone rebuild, our country’s infrastructure. Projections for Project Management and Skilled Labor tell us the issue is worsening by the day with no solution on the horizon. Confidence in employee and employer accountability is at an all time low. The painting and coating industry is both safety sensitive and labor intensive. This risk is unique, in that it touches every aspect of your company, starting with employee safety.
An Inspector’s duties can vary widely from project to project, quite often straying from the traditional observe, verify, and record. This paper examines the plethora of problems that can develop should an inspector be assigned too much or too little responsibility, as well as how best to avoid such developments.
Painting contractors can maximize their profits by directly demonstrating the value in their pricing and service, looking for opportunities to increase the scope of work for each job and investing in efficient techniques that allow them to carry out more jobs.
This paper will explore the process of conducting asset integrity management systems and the potential use for the existing facility data to analyze integrity status and predict any breach of integrity that would cause a direct major incident. In the dawn of the 4th industrial revolution and in the age of automation and artificial intelligence, asset integrity management systems are being integrated into a more sophisticated process of verification. Programs are being used to collect necessary risk-based data from inspection, maintenance programs and operational checklists in order to rationalize the integrity status and alert proponents of possible breach of integrity. These systems are more efficient than humans in predicting possible failures based on collective data from several critical elements from a facility and calculate the probability of failure based on the current integrity status. It is possible to optimize such systems to eliminate the human error factor and optimize inspection, maintenance and operation programs to better manage asset integrity. The result would be a software that would provide an overview of the plant’s integrity status and provide early alerts of any incoming incident event which allows the facility’s management to act accordingly and direct resources for effective prevention and mitigation.
We often make decisions in haste, using poor factoring, not thinking through all the variables, ignoring risk, and a great number of other things we won’t mention right now but you can imagine. What decisions or effort do we do daily that could be enhanced by better decisions, and by default better process. A decision is made up of pieces, each piece providing a building block to the end. What pieces we use make a difference.
Over the last few decades, people in the field of management have been involved in a search for the “best” style of leadership. Yet, the evidence from research clearly indicated that there is no single app-purpose leadership style. Successful leaders are those who can adapt their behavior to meet the demands of their unique situation.