Use code FLASH20 at checkout for 20% off all eBooks and eCourses
NACE external corrosion direct assessment (ECDA) process — assessing and reducing the impact of external corrosion on pipeline integrity.
We are unable to complete this action. Please try again at a later time.
If this error continues to occur, please contact AMPP Customer Support for assistance.
Use this error code for reference:
Please login to use Standards Credits*
* AMPP Members receive Standards Credits in order to redeem eligible Standards and Reports in the Store
You are not a Member.
AMPP Members enjoy many benefits, including Standards Credits which can be used to redeem eligible Standards and Reports in the Store.
You can visit the Membership Page to learn about the benefits of membership.
You have previously purchased this item.
Go to Downloadable Products in your AMPP Store profile to find this item.
You do not have sufficient Standards Credits to claim this item.
Click on 'ADD TO CART' to purchase this item.
Your Standards Credit(s)
1
Remaining Credits
0
Please review your transaction.
Click on 'REDEEM' to use your Standards Credits to claim this item.
You have successfully redeemed:
Go to Downloadable Products in your AMPP Store Profile to find and download this item.
Inspection of deaerator system welds. Boiler feedwater deaerator cracking. Design and fabrication of vessels and repair of existing vessels. Operational and water chemistry parameters.
One of the key factors affecting ship performance, particularly fuel consumption and associated GHG (Green House Gas) emissions, is the degree of biofouling on the immersed hull and propeller(s). Rates of biofouling accumulation vary considerably, depending on the suitability, age and physical condition of the coating system(s) applied to the hull, the voyaging, anchoring and lay up patterns of the ship, and the geographical regions where these take place.
When distress of a structure is evident, it is important to determine the nature of the degradation to select the best restoration strategy. This standard practice provides testing procedures and investigative techniques for the evaluation of masonry-clad steel frame buildings. The investigation and evaluation techniques described in this standard focus on degradation resulting from corrosion of the steel frame.
This standard provides the investigator, corrosion specialist, engineer, or owner a framework for evaluating the corrosion condition of a steel frame building beyond simple visual inspection and basic sounding techniques. Evaluation techniques that identify general and localized corrosion of masonry-clad steel frame buildings are provided.
This standard is intended for use by corrosion specialists, historic architects, structural engineers, and exterior building envelope consultants involved with evaluating corrosion of steel frame buildings and the subsequent effect on the masonry cladding. It also may be useful to owners of historic buildings whose service life may be affected by steel frame corrosion.
HISTORICAL DOCUMENTS. These publications have been suspended by a more current edition. References should be made to the latest standards published by AMPP for the most current criteria.
Each standard includes guidelines for surface preparation, coating system materials and application, coating of particular parts and attachments, inspection, and more.
Requirements for "Commercial" - one of five levels of cleanliness of steel surfaces achieved by blast cleaning with the use of abrasives. (White Metal, Near-White Metal, Commercial, Industrial, Brush Off)
In the spring of 2014, a new SSPC-PA21 standard is scheduled to be published. Despite the fact that this is the second major revision in as many years, new technologies and techniques have been introduced since the 2014 standard was revised and sent to ballot. Some examples include a factory-calibrated coating thickness gauge with pre-defined surface profiles, as well as a scanning probe designed to be slid across a cured coating while taking readings in real time. When these new technologies are put into practice, dramatic improvements in overall inspection times and data accuracy can be seen.
This standard describes a method for evaluating the qualifications of coating and lining inspection companies who perform quality control or quality assurance inspection of applied coatings and linings.
The purpose of this procedure is to determine whether a coating inspection company has a corporate organization that clearly defines the authority and responsibilities of positions typically required for operation of a Coating Inspection Company, employs qualified management and inspection personnel, has established and implemented a viable quality management system, and has knowledge of industry technical standards and inspection practices.
This standard is a part of the AMPP accreditation program for firms. Although the standard references certifications and qualifications for individuals, those certifications and qualifications are administered through separate programs.
HISTORICAL DOCUMENT. Requirements for "Near-White Metal" - one of five levels of cleanliness of steel surfaces achieved by blast cleaning with the use of abrasives. (White Metal, Near-White Metal, Commercial, Industrial, Brush Off)
Requirements for "Industrial" - one of five levels of cleanliness of steel surfaces achieved by blast cleaning with the use of abrasives. (White Metal, Near-White Metal, Commercial, Industrial, Brush Off)
Requirements for "White Metal" - one of five levels of cleanliness of steel surfaces achieved by blast cleaning with the use of abrasives. (White Metal, Near-White Metal, Commercial, Industrial, Brush Off)
This paper will explore the concept of a “Standard of Care” as applied to coating inspection on industrial coatings projects. Establishing a “Standard of Care” for coating inspection sets an expectation for those providing, procuring or otherwise interacting with inspectors on an industrial coatings job.