Celebrate World Corrosion Awareness Day with 20% off eCourses and eBooks with code WCAD2024 at checkout!
CORRECTED VERSION AS OF 1/14/2022. Analysis of available and emerging technologies in the field of in-line inspection tools and review their status with respect to characteristics, performance, range of application, and limitations. This is a companion guide to SP0102.
The following corrections have been made in NACE Publication 35100-2017, “In-Line Inspection of Pipelines.”Date: January 14, 2022Corrections:•Reference 2 on p. 20 has been revised from “Specifications and Requirements for Intelligent Pig Inspection of Pipelines, Pipeline Operators Forum (POF), http://www.pipelineoperators.org/publicdocs/POF_specs_2009.pdf (Rijswijk, Netherlands: 2009).” to “Specifications and Requirements for Intelligent Pig Inspection of Pipelines, Pipeline Operators Forum (POF), 2016.”•Two citations of reference 2 in Appendix B (pp. 30 and 31) have been revised from “…from POF document. [ref.]” to “…from Table 2.1 of the POF document.2”•Metric-to-U.S. Customary unit conversions have been corrected throughout Appendix B.Published as: NACE Publication 35100-2017 (Corrected Copy)
We are unable to complete this action. Please try again at a later time.
If this error continues to occur, please contact AMPP Customer Support for assistance.
Use this error code for reference:
Please login to use Standards Credits*
* AMPP Members receive Standards Credits in order to redeem eligible Standards and Reports in the Store
You are not a Member.
AMPP Members enjoy many benefits, including Standards Credits which can be used to redeem eligible Standards and Reports in the Store.
You can visit the Membership Page to learn about the benefits of membership.
You have previously purchased this item.
Go to Downloadable Products in your AMPP Store profile to find this item.
You do not have sufficient Standards Credits to claim this item.
Click on 'ADD TO CART' to purchase this item.
Your Standards Credit(s)
1
Remaining Credits
0
Please review your transaction.
Click on 'REDEEM' to use your Standards Credits to claim this item.
You have successfully redeemed:
Go to Downloadable Products in your AMPP Store Profile to find and download this item.
This technical report discusses equipment, procedures, materials, and the resulting substrate conditions involved in a variety of WAB cleaning methods currently available for commercial use. It also discusses the effect that the water present with these wet cleaning methods has on achieving the defined degree of cleaning of steel surfaces in accordance with the wet abrasive blast cleaning standards found in the list of Referenced Standards and Other Consensus Documents. It is intended for use primarily by specifiers, owners, painting contractors, inspectors, and others involved in surface preparation of industrial structures.
This report was originally issued in 1998 and has been revised to include additional configurations of equipment setup as well as current (2022) developments in the design of wet abrasive blast cleaning systems and nozzles. This TR provides a foundation to assist users to determine the quantity and quality of water, abrasive, and air.
This paper is Part II of a two-part series intended to narrate the history, some of which has been forgotten over time, leading up to the publication of the first Material Requirement (MR-01-75) standard prepared by NACE and its subsequent auxiliary standards. Previously, Part I1 described the field observations and discussed the metallurgical factors that were being investigated by the historical NACE T-1B and 1F committees to support the development a “harmonized” sour service materials standard. In Part II, we focus on the rationale behind the use of accelerated laboratory test procedures and their development to differentiate metallurgical behavior in sour environments.
This is Part I of a two-part series intended to provide background and a rational justification or supporting rationale for requirements leading to the development and publication of NACE(1) MR 0175 and ISO(2) 15156. Part I focuses on some of the metallurgical and processing requirements; specifically, Rockwell C 22 scale (HRC) limit, the various acceptable heat treatments and the 1wt% Ni limit for carbon and low alloy steels to minimize the threat of sulfide stress cracking (SSC) in H2S containing environments. Part II describes the testing and rationale behind the use of accelerated laboratory test procedures and their development to differentiate metallurgical behavior in sour environments.
The NACE TM0208-2018 Jar Test remains an industry-wide recognized standard for evaluating the vapor-inhibiting ability (VIA) of raw materials and finished products to provide off-contact corrosion protection of steel surfaces1. It is particularly useful for comparing the efficacy of different VCI chemistries, as well as for monitoring performance consistency between productions of VCI functionalized materials.
Procedures to design, install, and inspect thin-film organic linings in carbon steel process vessels to prevent corrosion, other degradation or product contamination.
Thermal precleaning for tanks, vessels, rail tank cars and hopper cars, and equipment, preparing surfaces for the application of high-performance or high-bake coating and lining systems.
Note: This document was originally published with errors in Table A.16, page 3-32. These identified errors are corrected. Errata sheet is included.
NACE MR0175/ISO 15156 gives requirements and recommendations for the selection and qualification of carbon and low-alloy steels, corrosion-resistant alloys, and other alloys for service in equipment used in oil and natural gas production and natural gas treatment plants in H2S-containing environments, whose failure could pose a risk to the health and safety of the public and personnel or to the equipment itself.
The use of cased carrier pipe for pipelines crossing under highways and railroads has been common practice in the industry. The first cased crossings were made using large-diameter pipe. The carrier pipe was mechanically coupled and pushed through the casing, and the coupling or collars were in direct contact with it. When coatings came into general use, isolating spacers were made of hemp rope saturated with pipe-coating enamel. End seals consisting of either concrete or pipe-coating enamel were poured into each end of the casing. The current practice of installing cased carrier pipe has changed only slightly since the beginning of its use. External loading of the carrier pipe has now been eliminated by the installation of heavy-wall casing pipe, and isolating spacers are used to prevent electrical contact between the casing and the carrier pipe. End seals are used to keep electrolyte (e.g., mud, water) out of the annular space between the carrier pipe and casing.
Operation of a cooling tower. Chemical, physical, and microbiological monitoring. For technical staff and operation, engineering, maintenance & sales personnel.
Thermoplastic liners are used to protect new and rehabilitated pipelines from internal corrosion in oilfield service. This Standard Practice is intended for use by liner designers and installers, owners of lined pipelines, liner materials suppliers, consultants, and construction and engineering firms engaged in the subject field. It is intended to provide guidance to designers, specifiers, installers, and operators of oilfield pipelines that use thermoplastic liners as a corrosion and/or abrasion mitigation method.