Celebrate World Corrosion Awareness Day with 20% off eCourses and eBooks with code WCAD2024 at checkout!
Two test methods for evaluating water quality for subsurface injection. A. rate vs cumulative volume (for waterquality monitoring), B. Suspended solids test (for diagnosis or monitoring). Historical Document 1992
We are unable to complete this action. Please try again at a later time.
If this error continues to occur, please contact AMPP Customer Support for assistance.
Use this error code for reference:
Please login to use Standards Credits*
* AMPP Members receive Standards Credits in order to redeem eligible Standards and Reports in the Store
You are not a Member.
AMPP Members enjoy many benefits, including Standards Credits which can be used to redeem eligible Standards and Reports in the Store.
You can visit the Membership Page to learn about the benefits of membership.
You have previously purchased this item.
Go to Downloadable Products in your AMPP Store profile to find this item.
You do not have sufficient Standards Credits to claim this item.
Click on 'ADD TO CART' to purchase this item.
Your Standards Credit(s)
1
Remaining Credits
0
Please review your transaction.
Click on 'REDEEM' to use your Standards Credits to claim this item.
You have successfully redeemed:
Go to Downloadable Products in your AMPP Store Profile to find and download this item.
Two standard test methods to evaluate quality of injection water in oilfield equipment. Apparatus. Test conditions. Procedures. Reporting. Supplementary tests.
Two test methods for evaluating water quality for subsurface injection: A. rate versus cumulative volume test (for water-quality monitoring) B. Suspended solids test (for diagnosis or monitoring). Historical Document 1999
Two test methods for evaluating the performance of protective coatings and linings used as lining materials in immersion service: one-side testing of the panel and immersion testing of the panel. Historical Document 1991
HISTORICAL DOCUMENT. Standard test methods for evaluating protective coatings for immersion service. Two test methods for evaluation of both chemical resistance and permeability for coatings on any substrate.
Two test methods for evaluating the performance of protective coatings and linings used as lining materials in immersion service: one-side testing of the panel and immersion testing of the panel. Historical Document 1996
This document…is directed toward the testing of metals for resistance to cracking failure in aqueous environments containing H2S. Historical Document 1990
The testing of metals for resistance to cracking failure under the combined action of tensile stress and corrosion in aqueous environments containing hydrogen sulfide (H2S)...termed sulfide stress cracking (SSC) Historical Document 1996
Test method…to evaluate and compare the corrosion protection that various internal plastic coatings afford oilfield tubular goods…with flowing water at a given velocity under controlled temperatures for a specified period of time. Historical Document 1993
Provides manufacturers, applicators, and users of internal pipe coatings with a method of comparing the performance of these coatings. Historical Document 2006
THE MOST COMMONLY USED TESTS TO EVALUATE ATMOSPHERIC SURFACE COATINGS ARE: (1) ATMOSPHERIC EXPOSURE: (2) COATING PROPERTIES SUCH AS CHEMICAL, ABRASION, AND TEMPERATURE RESISTANCE: AND (3) ACCELERATED TESTS SUCH AS THE CARBON ARC RADIATION-WATER SPRAY, INTERMITTENT IMMERSION, AND SALT SPRAY (FOG) TESTS.
Tests to evaluate atmospheric surface coatings…(1) atmospheric exposure…(2) coating properties…(3) accelerated tests Historical Document 1988